From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4591FCC6B08 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xGYmb-0002qV-PP; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 05:26:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xGYmX-0002oQ-Lh for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 05:26:49 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xGYmT-0004Ut-7d for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 05:26:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1791883603; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Q0OZL1995Bz696SPHYwnvGMDPJ13sGzioecQYMEGYjk=; b=DdfFQg/YqEpA58cpwKC7Tyq1f4TfTYk0iw3JuSttSBj7qoRJHIBhaU5RHxbnDJEwusNBzM HPSOYFwIw4BJHOp/OG2pDq+PeZDYqDShoDAQZluTkiB81Qu1oHb85RaFxu16xHQOPVHXOR 2QQbc+iG25/rp3YST8B+FYn5UAhVtcY= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-564-d1s6RyTgMQaJ8obtjPUvHg-1; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:26:39 +0000 X-MC-Unique: d1s6RyTgMQaJ8obtjPUvHg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: d1s6RyTgMQaJ8obtjPUvHg_1791883597 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE3A180AD43; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (headnet03.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.114]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D80195608B; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:26:25 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Pierrick Bouvier Cc: luoyonggang@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Cleber Rosa , Stefan Hajnoczi , =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Le Goater , Laurent Vivier , Zhao Liu , John Snow , Laurent Vivier , Richard Henderson , Joel Stanley , Fabiano Rosas , Kane Chen , Andrew Jeffery , Troy Lee , Jamin Lin , Stafford Horne , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Philippe Mathieu-Daude , Peter Maydell , Paolo Bonzini , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Steven Lee , Alexander Bulekov , Darren Kenny Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] target-info: replace QOM registration with a constructor list Message-ID: References: <20261007115253.328-1-luoyonggang@gmail.com> <20261007115253.328-5-luoyonggang@gmail.com> <37275f1f-aee9-444b-aaed-3e0bf34b63cd@oss.qualcomm.com> <919a1a75-78b9-42a9-93ed-9edf6757f707@oss.qualcomm.com> <578afeb7-d302-402e-bedf-43b29ef00d5b@oss.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <578afeb7-d302-402e-bedf-43b29ef00d5b@oss.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.2 (2026-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: -ENjSiJlJ0Oor1VgF8rUObi_QuulIvZxYlxyCEX_ONk_1791883597 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.24, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 04:24:07PM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > On 10/7/2026 3:54 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > > My work is here. > > https://gitlab.com/lygstate-qemu/qemu/-/tree/combined-binary-multi-targets?ref_type=heads > > I am afraid of posting 300 pathces into threads to flood it(and > > disturbing yours). So I'll wait for your work first. and resolving > > conflicts later, that's really time-consuming. > > > > It's indeed not possible to send 300 patches and expect this to work, > whether it's on this mailing list, or any software forge also. > It's also not possible to send a link, and expect anyone to take a look > at the 373 commits sitting it on top of master. My name is not Claude. > Instead, humans have to progress step by step, based on feedback. Yes it > takes time and it can be frustrating. And yes, I've been there (and > frustrated) also, I feel sorry for you. > > At the moment, if we want to make it move on, we need to focus on one > single thing: > "How to document/specify which targets a machine support". > > > I did many explanations before. seems my explanation is too bad and > > not to give a clean picture for you, let's delay these first. > > > > If I can suggest something politely here, IMHO, alternating between > genuinely human written messages, and AI content sent as it is on email > or commit messages is not helping on the receiver side. > > I would prefer anytime to deal with imperfect english (mine is imperfect > too, I'm not a native speaker neither), compared to read what > Claude/GPT/Deepseek generated that was pasted as it is. > I understand it's a good tool for helping on the language side, and > that's ok to fix grammar and sentence structure. > But asking "Please generate a summary from those email threads and > explain what the current series is doing", and paste this is doomed to fail. > > It also has a very detrimental side effect: it makes me start to wonder > where the code is coming from also. Especially when seeing boilerplates > with lengthy comments written in perfect english. My 2 cents is, use AI > if you want/need, but make sure the result has this *human* touch. Although these are not yet final/commited, please bear in mind the proposed updated AI guidelines which broadly intend to forbid use of AI for authoring commit messages & cover letters: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-09/msg00260.html With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|