Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] gpiolib: kill gpio_request_one()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:09:14 +0200, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> said:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:40:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 8:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
> >> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is the finilazation of the work announced in the commit 61e1fd2abca4
> >> > ("gpiolib: legacy: Make sure we kill gpio_request_one() first"). With this
> >> > small series we kill gpio_request_one() and leave only two legacy calls
> >> > devm_gpio_request_one() and gpio_request(), where the managed one has only
> >> > a few users and high chances to be killed soon as well.
> >> >
> >> > The series is supposed to go via GPIO tree (due to nature of the last patch)
> >> > with possible immutable branch for others. Please, ack.
> >>
> >> The kernel is clearly a better place after these patches than before it, so:
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Bart, anything needs to be done for this series to go in?
> 
> We don't have Acks from MIPS maintainers. :(

Hmm... Usually Thomas is quick. Thomas, can you give your Ack if you agree with
the changes, please?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko