All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Andrea Parri" <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] nvmet: pci-epf: report transport errors in command completions
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:46:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as95tp8CF2lX4Gs0@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b4ee842-844e-4b6a-9ce8-0c4e7229825f@kernel.org>

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 05:12:16PM +0200, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2026/10/13 16:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I think this looks good.  Damien/Niklas, can you test this on hardware?
> 
> I do not have the hardware available right now. Niklas ? Can you test this?

I understand that these changes are not supposed to affect performance,
but posting it for completeness:


Before patches:

# ./fio-test.sh /dev/nvme0n1
Running on /dev/nvme0n1...
  Rnd read,    4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=3088, BW=12.1MiB/s (12.7MB/s)
  Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=45.4k, BW=177MiB/s (186MB/s)
  Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=47.8k, BW=187MiB/s (196MB/s)
  Rnd read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1803, BW=225MiB/s (236MB/s)
  Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=9078, BW=1135MiB/s (1190MB/s)
  Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=10.0k, BW=1253MiB/s (1314MB/s)
  Rnd read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1447, BW=724MiB/s (759MB/s)
  Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=2415, BW=1208MiB/s (1267MB/s)
  Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=2686, BW=1343MiB/s (1409MB/s)
  Rnd write,   4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=3046, BW=11.9MiB/s (12.5MB/s)
  Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=22.9k, BW=89.3MiB/s (93.6MB/s)
  Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=22.9k, BW=89.6MiB/s (94.0MB/s)
  Rnd write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1555, BW=194MiB/s (204MB/s)
  Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=6183, BW=773MiB/s (810MB/s)
  Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=6903, BW=863MiB/s (905MB/s)
  Seq read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1672, BW=209MiB/s (219MB/s)
  Seq read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=9033, BW=1129MiB/s (1184MB/s)
  Seq read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1580, BW=790MiB/s (829MB/s)
  Seq read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=2536, BW=1268MiB/s (1330MB/s)
  Seq read,    1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1297, BW=1297MiB/s (1360MB/s)
  Seq write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1547, BW=193MiB/s (203MB/s)
  Seq write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=6563, BW=820MiB/s (860MB/s)
  Seq write, 512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=893, BW=447MiB/s (469MB/s)
  Seq write, 512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1667, BW=834MiB/s (874MB/s)
  Seq write,   1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=762, BW=763MiB/s (800MB/s)
  Rnd rdwr, 4K..1MB, QD=8, 4 jobs:  IOPS=788, BW=396MiB/s (415MB/s)
 IOPS=811, BW=408MiB/s (427MB/s)


After patches:

# ./fio-test.sh /dev/nvme0n1
Running on /dev/nvme0n1...
  Rnd read,    4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=2958, BW=11.6MiB/s (12.1MB/s)
  Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=44.5k, BW=174MiB/s (182MB/s)
  Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=47.4k, BW=185MiB/s (194MB/s)
  Rnd read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1741, BW=218MiB/s (228MB/s)
  Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=9327, BW=1166MiB/s (1223MB/s)
  Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=10.2k, BW=1280MiB/s (1342MB/s)
  Rnd read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1444, BW=722MiB/s (758MB/s)
  Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=2505, BW=1253MiB/s (1313MB/s)
  Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=2516, BW=1258MiB/s (1319MB/s)
  Rnd write,   4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=3322, BW=13.0MiB/s (13.6MB/s)
  Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=22.8k, BW=89.1MiB/s (93.5MB/s)
  Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=22.9k, BW=89.4MiB/s (93.7MB/s)
  Rnd write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1529, BW=191MiB/s (201MB/s)
  Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=6369, BW=796MiB/s (835MB/s)
  Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=6449, BW=806MiB/s (845MB/s)
  Seq read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1690, BW=211MiB/s (222MB/s)
  Seq read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=9262, BW=1158MiB/s (1214MB/s)
  Seq read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1428, BW=714MiB/s (749MB/s)
  Seq read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=2652, BW=1326MiB/s (1391MB/s)
  Seq read,    1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1301, BW=1302MiB/s (1365MB/s)
  Seq write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1531, BW=191MiB/s (201MB/s)
  Seq write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=6144, BW=768MiB/s (805MB/s)
  Seq write, 512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=924, BW=462MiB/s (485MB/s)
  Seq write, 512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1468, BW=734MiB/s (770MB/s)
  Seq write,   1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=749, BW=749MiB/s (786MB/s)
  Rnd rdwr, 4K..1MB, QD=8, 4 jobs:  IOPS=786, BW=394MiB/s (414MB/s)
 IOPS=809, BW=407MiB/s (426MB/s)



Also used ftrace on the EP side to see that SGLs were actually being used:
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.152187: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.152560: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.153126: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.153702: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.154273: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.154807: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.155445: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.156263: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.156676: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.157340: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work
   kworker/u32:2-75      [005] .....   300.158096: nvmet_pci_epf_iod_parse_sgls <-nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work


I can not see anything wrong, thus:

Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 14:12 [PATCH 0/5] nvmet: fix stale data exposure and ZNS validation Andrea Parri
2026-10-12 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvmet-fc: only send read data for successful commands Andrea Parri
2026-10-12 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvmet: zns: don't leak stale memory in zone management receive Andrea Parri
2026-10-13 14:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-14 11:00     ` Andrea Parri
2026-10-14 13:04       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-13 15:47   ` Keith Busch
2026-10-12 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvmet: zns: reject a NUMD whose byte count wraps Andrea Parri
2026-10-13 14:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-14 11:00     ` Andrea Parri
2026-10-12 14:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvmet: pci-epf: report transport errors in command completions Andrea Parri
2026-10-13 14:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-13 15:12     ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-14 11:01       ` Andrea Parri
2026-10-14 12:46       ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-10-12 14:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvmet: pci-epf: require SGLs to match the command data length Andrea Parri
2026-10-13 14:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-14 12:47     ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as95tp8CF2lX4Gs0@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.