From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB09421A17; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791977526; cv=none; b=ATWOHSe9IJhLWz7EkFvBpp2DnHKYI7QuJBcgNDCcd8BoJBcIGlWaRBm9f+L/lJPY3aUM/88mUTUeE/CT7r4Vys2224BiGsXwl1yRQuqOsY+tNYxycXcCvSzvvJARz2UTI72T+VrkmC83IrvoRGkeegBKB3pZ7P9lq8IiG3KwBvA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791977526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+Rd5k+d13nleyW2dzkgfnCGEXri5yUU/WTAwy2Lxk2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iV/SYwwxc6XgTQPe46tM6dXo5zYJtSaXrQCF0M8uH9sWoFGjhZ0XDLx/hm8+7p0CnexE/jAq+Dx/DJ2Va3Pea1yVrYnNwrVzpP2AEG6sa6rMhJ+ewQ1C2zoBWPlKoZjQTXEYDo7jKCdqTvt4pOyIJIm+VDJN3KFM3Ublj1e5SWc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=d+1Lb6fi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="d+1Lb6fi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1791977520; bh=aLvuCbFsYXaoGkViCDmKwfxKvrW9hK/F/IhTbSlZYgM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=d+1Lb6firUfBIBI+Pn4XWTV90icvi78FD2kJofvAzpttSrPjknK6Y3bD5oj9uocey 4UMTBVl0+svG+1DqLWwQ7pkibdqmvqwn8B8yBzHXszpobTzMgfY08i8kUfjvZJuzUR aYN3I9rSKjLEiz9s6VYbRcmT9Eyc5kYvK+BfHWL3aiyO4gZu5ECjWiGFp7dENLt/q3 LOURBrzGbwHJpFrOgH3x5CCD5bHHDHRVuPE5J5rQBIA3QMqPJjNDJf9lpdXR9srTk6 C5C/AkhNUQwjrDMPr55NUavduigOsbbWDUFRX0h+a86r6SPjS0VX68KAsV797lUj7C wf9ZiUOOaT+Cg== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 9E58060052; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:32:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:31:57 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, ja@ssi.bg, lorenzo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] Netfilter/IPVS updates for net-next Message-ID: References: <20261011215953.1334630-1-pablo@netfilter.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 01:23:46PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Florian Westphal wrote: > > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > sashiko reports: > > > > > > "If an IPv4 packet from an AF_INET socket is encapsulated by an IPv6 tunnel, > > > the tunnel preserves the AF_INET socket in skb->sk while transmitting the > > > outer IPv6 packet on the LOCAL_OUT path." > > > > > > This sounds like an unrelated issue, I don't know yet how that can > > > happen TBH. > > > > I'm stupid and I don't understand why this would be a regression. > > > > This change makes things stricter, so it doesn't enable anything that > > wasn't allowed before, how does this add a new crash regression? :-( > > Please toss this patch. Lets ignore this problem. I really think LLM is just getting confused, because the series contains flowtable support for IPv4-over-IPv6 and vice-versa. Then, the LLM tries to find the same pattern in the patches coming in this PR batch !:-D