From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D56BCA5FF0 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xDfAD-0004O5-Q4; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:39:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xDfA8-0004Kz-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:39:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xDfA7-0005lI-54 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:39:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1791193149; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=XTD33Ze437RIyD1HN/Z7Ka/Uk5oV0YYG4eEC0r6aeQc=; b=PXfcNUgTLWMOUAz5aYM+xr8NOstf+GdYAfrdpGw34ohG+etmPS9Z+dFpV8d4rF69HfSFNA JpuogLOBeydaPH1A2OHJpCa5a8wbNmBuWCLLiNcyiPtUuFbiAqjbCCQtCTOp2uh+wEOGXi GWQ49I9+6vVNIorRs/e/86Y5fOUf/84= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-574-eIPyz1uXNNe0JUYtKo6Ylw-1; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:39:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eIPyz1uXNNe0JUYtKo6Ylw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: eIPyz1uXNNe0JUYtKo6Ylw_1791193146 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAF519539BA; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (headnet03.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.114]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA95C30000E4; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 10:39:00 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] hw/usb: mark commonly used USB devices/hosts as secure Message-ID: References: <20260911143627.2743803-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20260911143627.2743803-11-berrange@redhat.com> <179096166117.3025252.2297105460212965387.b4-review@b4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179096166117.3025252.2297105460212965387.b4-review@b4> User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.2 (2026-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 10 X-Spam_score: 1.0 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.24, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 09:21:01PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote: > > Most of the standardized USB1/2/3 host controllers are relevant > > for virtualization use cases, so should be declared secure. The > > "NEC" XHCI variant is slightly non-standard, but since it is a > > trivial sub-class of the generic XHCI, there's no reason to > > exclude it. > > > > The set of devices that are expected to be used is HID (mouse, > > tablet, keyboard), host passthrough, CCID (smartcard), hub, > > storage and the redirect tunnelling. > > Can't we exclude uhci/ehci nowadays? RHEL-10 still ships both, so there's still a demand from a downstream POV, but USB is in an awkward place with its lack of maintainership, and arguably these should be considered obsolete. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|