From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench: Add atomic CAS benchmark
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 15:30:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asQlFvclL-vj5xlh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930091617.4189736-1-changbin.du@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 05:16:17PM +0800, Changbin Du wrote:
> Add a new 'atomic' collection to perf bench for benchmarking
> compare-and-swap (CAS) atomic operations with multi-threaded
> contention testing.
>
> The benchmark tests __atomic_compare_exchange_n operations
> with configurable thread count and iteration count to measure
> atomic contention effects.
>
> Why this benchmark is needed:
> - CAS operations are fundamental to lock-free algorithms and data
> structures. Understanding their performance characteristics under
> contention is critical for designing high-performance concurrent
> applications.
> - The benchmark helps identify atomic operation latency and
> scalability issues across different thread counts, revealing
> contention patterns that are not visible in single-threaded tests.
> - Useful for evaluating atomic implementation quality on different
> architectures and for regression testing after changes to atomic
> primitives or memory ordering.
>
> Measurement methodology:
> - Each thread starts a private timer (clock_gettime CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> after synchronizing on a pthread_barrier, ensuring all threads
> begin simultaneously.
> - Each thread performs a hot loop of atomic compare-and-swap on a
> shared u64 counter, incrementing from 0 to iterations.
> - The shared counter is cache-line aligned (64 bytes) to isolate
> contention to the target cache line and avoid false sharing.
> - The wall-clock time is measured as the max of all per-thread
> runtimes (the time for the slowest thread to finish).
> - The first repeat is excluded from statistics as a warmup phase
> to avoid cache-cold effects.
> Example usage:
> $ perf bench atomic cas --threads 2
> # Running 'atomic/cas' benchmark:
>
> Threads: 2, iterations/thread: 100000000, repeats: 10 (warmup: 1)
> Avg wall-clock time: 7365.480 msec (stddev 66.014 msec)
> Total ops: 200,000,000
> Throughput total: 27,153,697 ops/sec
> Per-thread times and throughput (last repeat):
> fastest: 7510.031 msec (13315525 ops/sec)
> slowest: 7581.678 msec (13189692 ops/sec)
> avg: 7545.854 msec (13252310 ops/sec)
>
> Output fields explained:
> - Threads: number of contending threads
> - iterations/thread: CAS operations each thread performs
> - repeats: number of test runs (first is warmup)
> - Avg wall-clock time: mean time for all threads to complete
> - stddev: standard deviation across repeats
> - Total ops: threads x iterations/thread
> - Throughput total: aggregate ops/sec across all threads
> - Per-thread times: fastest/slowest/avg thread completion time
> - Per-thread throughput: per-thread ops/sec (shows scheduling imbalance)
Thanks for the contribution! I think it's very useful.
Just a few suggestions.
1. it'd be nice to add simple atomic_inc benchmark too.
2. it'd be nice to have an option to try other ordering requirements
than "relaxed".
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Assisted-by: opencode:DeepSeek-V4-Pro
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt | 22 +++
> tools/perf/bench/Build | 1 +
> tools/perf/bench/atomic.c | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/bench/bench.h | 1 +
> tools/perf/builtin-bench.c | 8 +
> 5 files changed, 261 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/bench/atomic.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
> index c5913cf59c98..9cdc19f02bcf 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
> @@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ SUBSYSTEM
> 'numa'::
> NUMA scheduling and MM benchmarks.
>
> +'atomic'::
> + Atomic operation benchmarks.
> +
> 'futex'::
> Futex stressing benchmarks.
>
> @@ -283,6 +286,25 @@ SUITES FOR 'numa'
> *mem*::
> Suite for evaluating NUMA workloads.
>
> +SUITES FOR 'atomic'
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +*cas*::
> +Suite for evaluating compare-and-swap (CAS) atomic operations under
> +multi-threaded contention.
> +
> +Options of *cas*
> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +-t::
> +--threads=::
> +Number of threads contending for the shared counter (default: 2).
> +
> +-i::
> +--iterations=::
> +Number of iterations per thread (default: 100000000).
> +
> +The per-thread fastest/slowest/avg summary is only printed when
> +running with more than one thread.
> +
> SUITES FOR 'futex'
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> *hash*::
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Build b/tools/perf/bench/Build
> index 67b76fe20ba6..c64c52468d3d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bench/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Build
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ perf-bench-y += sched-pipe.o
> perf-bench-y += sched-seccomp-notify.o
> perf-bench-y += syscall.o
> perf-bench-y += mem-functions.o
> +perf-bench-y += atomic.o
> perf-bench-y += futex.o
> perf-bench-y += futex-hash.o
> perf-bench-y += futex-wake.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/atomic.c b/tools/perf/bench/atomic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ce97025018ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/atomic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2026 Changbin Du
> + *
> + * Benchmark for atomic compare-and-swap (CAS) operations.
> + *
> + * Measures throughput (ops/sec) of contended CAS on a single shared
> + * counter across multiple threads. Each thread performs a hot loop
> + * of compare-and-swap, competing with all other threads for the
> + * same cache line.
> + */
> +#include "bench.h"
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include "../util/debug.h"
> +
> +#ifndef HAVE_PTHREAD_BARRIER
> +int bench_atomic(int argc __maybe_unused, const char **argv __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + pr_err("%s: pthread_barrier_t unavailable, disabling this test...\n", __func__);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else /* HAVE_PTHREAD_BARRIER */
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +#include <time.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <err.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/time64.h>
> +#include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
> +#include "../util/stat.h"
> +
> +static unsigned int threads = 2;
> +static unsigned int iterations = 100000000;
> +
> +static const struct option options[] = {
> + OPT_UINTEGER('t', "threads", &threads,
> + "Number of threads contending for the counter"),
> + OPT_UINTEGER('i', "iterations", &iterations,
> + "Number of iterations per thread"),
> + OPT_END()
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const bench_usage[] = {
> + "perf bench atomic cas <options>",
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static u64 shared_counter __aligned(64);
> +static pthread_barrier_t start_barrier __aligned(64);
> +
> +struct worker_stats {
> + u64 runtime_ns;
> +};
> +
> +static void *worker(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct worker_stats *ws = (struct worker_stats *)arg;
> + struct timespec tstart, tend;
> + u64 i;
> +
> + pthread_barrier_wait(&start_barrier);
> +
> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tstart);
> + for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
> + u64 old_val, new_val;
> +
> + do {
> + old_val = __atomic_load_n(&shared_counter,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + new_val = old_val + 1;
> + } while (!__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&shared_counter,
> + &old_val, new_val,
> + false,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED));
> + }
> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tend);
> +
> + ws->runtime_ns = (tend.tv_sec - tstart.tv_sec) * NSEC_PER_SEC +
> + (tend.tv_nsec - tstart.tv_nsec);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void print_default_format(struct worker_stats *wstats,
> + struct stats *time_stats)
> +{
> + double time_avg, time_stddev;
> +
> + printf(" Threads: %u, iterations/thread: %u, repeats: %u (warmup: 1)\n",
> + threads, iterations, bench_repeat);
> +
> + time_avg = avg_stats(time_stats);
> + time_stddev = stddev_stats(time_stats);
> +
> + printf(" Avg wall-clock time: %.3f msec (stddev %.3f msec)\n",
> + time_avg / (double)NSEC_PER_MSEC,
> + time_stddev / (double)NSEC_PER_MSEC);
> + printf(" Total ops: %'" PRIu64 "\n",
> + iterations * (u64)threads);
> + printf(" Throughput total: %'.0f ops/sec\n",
> + (double)(iterations * (u64)threads) /
> + (time_avg / (double)NSEC_PER_SEC));
> +
> + /*
> + * Per-thread statistics from the last measured repeat show
> + * fairness / imbalance in CPU scheduling.
> + */
> + if (threads > 1) {
> + u64 min_ns = UINT64_MAX, max_ns = 0, total_ns = 0;
> + double min_thru, max_thru, avg_thru;
> +
> + for (unsigned int t = 0; t < threads; t++) {
> + if (wstats[t].runtime_ns < min_ns)
> + min_ns = wstats[t].runtime_ns;
> + if (wstats[t].runtime_ns > max_ns)
> + max_ns = wstats[t].runtime_ns;
> + total_ns += wstats[t].runtime_ns;
> + }
> +
> + min_thru = (double)iterations * NSEC_PER_SEC / min_ns;
> + max_thru = (double)iterations * NSEC_PER_SEC / max_ns;
> + avg_thru = (double)threads * iterations * NSEC_PER_SEC / total_ns;
> +
> + printf(" Per-thread times and throughput (last repeat):\n");
> + printf(" fastest: %.3f msec (%.0f ops/sec)\n",
> + min_ns / (double)NSEC_PER_MSEC, min_thru);
> + printf(" slowest: %.3f msec (%.0f ops/sec)\n",
> + max_ns / (double)NSEC_PER_MSEC, max_thru);
> + printf(" avg: %.3f msec (%.0f ops/sec)\n",
> + (total_ns / threads) / (double)NSEC_PER_MSEC, avg_thru);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int run_cas_benchmark(void)
> +{
> + pthread_t *thread_ids;
> + struct worker_stats *wstats;
> + struct stats time_stats;
> + unsigned int r, t;
> +
> + thread_ids = calloc(threads, sizeof(pthread_t));
> + if (!thread_ids)
> + return -1;
> +
> + wstats = calloc(threads, sizeof(struct worker_stats));
> + if (!wstats) {
> + free(thread_ids);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + init_stats(&time_stats);
> +
> + for (r = 0; r < bench_repeat + 1; r++) {
> + u64 max_runtime_ns = 0;
> +
> + shared_counter = 0;
> + pthread_barrier_init(&start_barrier, NULL, threads);
> +
> + for (t = 0; t < threads; t++) {
> + if (pthread_create(&thread_ids[t], NULL,
> + worker, &wstats[t]))
> + err(EXIT_FAILURE, "pthread_create");
> + }
> +
> + for (t = 0; t < threads; t++)
> + pthread_join(thread_ids[t], NULL);
> +
> + pthread_barrier_destroy(&start_barrier);
> +
> + for (t = 0; t < threads; t++) {
> + if (wstats[t].runtime_ns > max_runtime_ns)
> + max_runtime_ns = wstats[t].runtime_ns;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Exclude the first repeat (warmup) from statistics so
> + * that cache-cold and lazy-init effects are not counted.
> + */
> + if (r > 0)
> + update_stats(&time_stats, max_runtime_ns);
> + }
> +
> + switch (bench_format) {
> + case BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT:
> + print_default_format(wstats, &time_stats);
> + break;
> +
> + case BENCH_FORMAT_SIMPLE:
> + printf("%.0f\n",
> + (double)(iterations * (u64)threads) /
> + (avg_stats(&time_stats) / (double)NSEC_PER_SEC));
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + fprintf(stderr, "Unknown format: %d\n", bench_format);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + free(thread_ids);
> + free(wstats);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int bench_atomic(int argc, const char **argv)
> +{
> + if (parse_options(argc, argv, options, bench_usage, 0)) {
> + usage_with_options(bench_usage, options);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + if (threads < 1) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Invalid thread count: %u\n", threads);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (iterations < 1) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Invalid iteration count: %u\n", iterations);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return run_cas_benchmark();
> +}
> +#endif /* HAVE_PTHREAD_BARRIER */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/bench.h b/tools/perf/bench/bench.h
> index 8519eb5a42fa..01eb6ceffb8d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bench/bench.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/bench.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ int bench_mem_memcpy(int argc, const char **argv);
> int bench_mem_memset(int argc, const char **argv);
> int bench_mem_mmap(int argc, const char **argv);
> int bench_mem_find_bit(int argc, const char **argv);
> +int bench_atomic(int argc, const char **argv);
> int bench_futex_hash(int argc, const char **argv);
> int bench_futex_wake(int argc, const char **argv);
> int bench_futex_wake_parallel(int argc, const char **argv);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c b/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c
> index 02d47913cc6a..aeffa0826aea 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> * syscall ... System call performance
> * mem ... memory access performance
> * numa ... NUMA scheduling and MM performance
> + * atomic ... Atomic operation performance
> * futex ... Futex performance
> * epoll ... Event poll performance
> */
> @@ -115,6 +116,12 @@ static const struct bench uprobe_benchmarks[] = {
> { NULL, NULL, NULL },
> };
>
> +static const struct bench atomic_benchmarks[] = {
> + { "cas", "Benchmark CAS (compare-and-swap) operations", bench_atomic },
> + { "all", "Run all atomic benchmarks", NULL },
> + { NULL, NULL, NULL }
> +};
> +
> struct collection {
> const char *name;
> const char *summary;
> @@ -128,6 +135,7 @@ static const struct collection collections[] = {
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
> { "numa", "NUMA scheduling and MM benchmarks", numa_benchmarks },
> #endif
> + { "atomic", "Atomic operation benchmarks", atomic_benchmarks },
> {"futex", "Futex stressing benchmarks", futex_benchmarks },
> #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> {"epoll", "Epoll stressing benchmarks", epoll_benchmarks },
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 9:16 [PATCH] perf bench: Add atomic CAS benchmark Changbin Du
2026-09-30 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-05 22:30 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-10-07 5:27 ` Changbin Du
2026-10-07 21:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-10-08 7:44 ` David Laight
2026-10-09 10:04 ` Changbin Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asQlFvclL-vj5xlh@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.