All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger@xenproject.org>
To: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: Fix IO race during unplug
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 16:14:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asUCYtIJkFchdbNH@Mac.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006135807.2571779-1-ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 02:58:06PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> During unplug, blkfront stops the hw queues and marks the disk as dead,
> then later during removal calls del_gendisk(). However, IO issued after
> the hw queues are stopped but before the call to del_gendisk() will be
> queued but never handled. This causes del_gendisk() to hang forever
> waiting for the queue refcount to drop to zero.
> 
> This can be reproduced by issuing IO during an artificial delay after
> stopping the hw queues.

So the window is between the blk_mq_stop_hw_queues() and
blk_mark_disk_dead() calls where requests would be queued and never
processed?

> Fix this by simply not stopping the hw queues directly. Marking the disk
> as dead also freezes the queue which prevents new requests being added
> and it synchronously runs the hw queues to clear anything pending.

I think this likely needs expanding a bit: the disk is already marked
as dead with the current logic, and in the same place in the code.

> Fixes: 8e141f9eb803 ("block: drain file system I/O on del_gendisk")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
> ---
> 
> I'm not sure about the Fixes tag. It's the most likely looking candidate
> to me but I didn't confirm whether it actually introduced the
> regression.

I was wondering the same, and even then someone might argue this was a
latent bug in blkfront itself, and the reference commit just exposed
it.  I don't have a strong opinion.

> 
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index 8dad7bf5f664..69a2315a1b20 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -2138,10 +2138,8 @@ static void blkfront_closing(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* No more blkif_request(). */
> -	if (info->rq && info->gd) {
> -		blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(info->rq);
> +	if (info->gd)
>  		blk_mark_disk_dead(info->gd);

So blk_mark_disk_dead() behaves differently when called with the
queues still active?

Thanks, Roger.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06 13:58 [PATCH] xen-blkfront: Fix IO race during unplug Ross Lagerwall
2026-10-06 14:14 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2026-10-06 14:43   ` Ross Lagerwall
2026-10-06 15:27     ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asUCYtIJkFchdbNH@Mac.lan \
    --to=roger@xenproject.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.