From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: improve handling of skipped tests
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 21:48:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asfzfFuBFVKP5WQA@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916213108.9234-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 470 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 11:31:08PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Here are some fixes for issues I found in 'rtctest' while checking RTC
> drivers. Details are in the patch descriptions. Patches 1+2 have been
> tested on HW. Patch 3 has not been tested, just follows the pattern of
> patch 2, but may need more discussion in general. Please read there.
> Looking forward to comments!
I guess at least patches 1+2 are good to go? Who would pick them,
Alexandre or Shuah?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 21:31 [PATCH 0/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: improve handling of skipped tests Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: don't mention skipping twice Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: make missing UIEs really skip Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 21:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: skip properly if setting alarm fails Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 19:48 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-10-08 22:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: improve handling of skipped tests Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asfzfFuBFVKP5WQA@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.