From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1750235CB81 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791572633; cv=none; b=YyGouPhd6ExHr0es/V9xG3lcMSv+LwLV3Tv432KM7PJ3SPQGENHeRLlf/89Q21xycQaGxTK50czU7DAQkr+syEf2VIE8myHwIoJtB11WmciwcXwfYFs4oiJan0kCRbzpCJIcbmaFqcJdVv0cL4FMFva4EtuVs49CB54LdTl4yoo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791572633; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VoT/TewX7ILg1FNeG8ESEgdbpxTY/afUPypxYW5Hx9c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bPWwXK///yiF+geN8JAcOAWcyb3D7c4nMRd/B78+FPNJa2b9owDuy8m+XoEIKO56B7fjIpATgtgE+n5ethjYN260OpYVlcfdmFNiw8jqEEO6VFd6SOhKsdGvLpIMYgJdiWEkjuKaUtmpzQndnFfysSHjl7YZ1MnY/3WczrhJqzY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b=ZVhZ1Frl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b="ZVhZ1Frl" Received: from macsyma.thunk.org (99-196-133-108.cust.exede.net [99.196.133.108] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 699J3OCX018268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Oct 2026 15:03:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1791572621; bh=4NBQe6SoFt7hS7NEi6euioamMHaacydLv3Db8C3tsXY=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZVhZ1FrlGmhFgEvBaFBF90oI+WBxat0Le5ZLxMsp3RL7Ots2PyT103MJ8RMQlz5fe wQmm/nfykRbADSfk5E/Gopof+SJAbIgbobzSZxTNy3V1hfPa1UvA7StD5lWkiaUzJM o7n10q8ohyN2fun7viLGDfJEkP0rYsVV1ZET9/Aizgi/TBBOQ2S6LH8FnxnDFasQLb YQPrOdxOqtltWfYP4DQAzPXVOkEnQDn1aB/F+TUsmIFatoue2rxxcurctcg6JMh2It JjPlLKdMUdDck7mcVgNi11W4aJHNIPkCV36Iz8yM6d6+CsjUOxleYQzQM6SkoRS4dC j9l1ZFMU0S9nA== Received: by macsyma.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 82E301FABF6C; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 15:03:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 15:03:20 -0400 From: "Theodore Tso" To: Zhang Yi Cc: kernel test robot , Zhang Yi , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Ojaswin Mujoo Subject: Re: [tytso-ext4:dev 21/41] fs/ext4/inode.c:4002:24: sparse: sparse: symbol 'ext4_iomap_buffered_read_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: References: <202610082225.lcsAyIiF-lkp@intel.com> <5bac3071-5823-4714-8c39-662b91c927a3@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5bac3071-5823-4714-8c39-662b91c927a3@gmail.com> On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 10:55:18AM -0500, Zhang Yi wrote: > Hi Ted, would it be okay to replace the current version with my v7 on > ext4 dev branch after I send it out? Sure, no problem. I took a quick look and it looks like there were one or two new Sashiko issues? I'll give time for folks to take a look, and I'll rerun my tests on the v7 patch series, so I might not pull it in right away. - Ted