From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] zram: use rw_semaphore for decompression streams
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:28:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <assQJStvoDK0nepk@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009071157.3730698-12-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On (26/10/09 16:11), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Currently, per-CPU decompression streams use a mutex, so there is
> a chance for priority inversion - a low priority Reader can get
> preempted by a higher priority Reader, which simply will get
> blocked on the stream mutex.
>
> Switch zcomp_dstrm lock from mutex to rw_semaphore to permit parallel
> usage. However, things are not completely straightforward. Many
> backends have stateless decompression and don't modify decompression
> context, so those can be used concurrently. But then there are backends
> that do modify decompression context. We also can have compressed
> object span across physical pages, which zcomp linearises using stream's
> ->local_copy buffer before decompression. That buffer, clearly, cannot
> be used concurrently.
>
> When the backend has no per-stream decompression context (stateless)
> and zsmalloc object fits in a single page (ZCOMP_DECOMP_INPLACE), take
> the stream lock in shared mode (read). Otherwise, when ->local_copy
> is needed (ZCOMP_DECOMP_BOUNCE) or the backend has a decompression
> context (zstd, deflate), take the lock in exclusive mode (write).
>
> A quick synthetic fio test on 24 CPUs (preempt=full, lz4, 48 low
> priority (nice 19) readers, 24 normal priority (nice 0) CPU hogs
> and 24 high priority (nice -19) readers):
>
> Metric Base Patched
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Read IOPS 473k 680k (+43.8%)
> Read clat avg 35.98 us 21.28 us (-40.9%)
> Read clat p99.95 55.55 us 20.86 us (-2.7x)
> Read clat p99.99 6,717 us 2,834 us (-2.4x)
> Read clat max 2,005,100 us 1,614,300 us (-19.5%)
>
> Suggested-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
JFI
I have completely reworked this patch. Will run tests and then
send out v3.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 7:11 [PATCH v2 00/11] zram: redesign zcomp and rework backends Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] zram: prefix backends printk-s Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] zram: remove debugfs entry on init failure Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] zram: zstd: do not allocate empty C/D-dictionaries Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] zram: lz4hc: pre-initialize dictionary stream in setup_params Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] zram: lz4: use LZ4_decompress_safe_usingDict() Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] zram: lz4hc: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] zram: zstd: do not use kvzalloc() for zstd allocations Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] zram: reset writeback state in zram_reset_device() Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] zram: split zcomp into separate R/W streams Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] zram: use a singleton compression context for recompression Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] zram: use rw_semaphore for decompression streams Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-11 4:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=assQJStvoDK0nepk@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=richardycc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.