All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peterx@redhat.com, mjt@tls.msk.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC] container images for migration-test
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:18:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asyX0JccFfG0ZMDp@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8733vbtmge.fsf@suse.de>

On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 08:58:09PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Hi, I just wanted to share and ask for feedback on some container images
> I've been building as part of my testing of migration pull-requests.
> 
> From a Dockerfile from ./tests/docker/dockerfiles/ I'm producing the
> following:
> 
> $ docker images
> qemu-build-base:11.0.0                        b6efa198e93a        5.8GB
> qemu-rootfs-base:11.0.0                       72bcb5418f4d       4.08GB
> qemu:11.0.0                                   018a3f0f4dcc          2GB

snip

> 2) Neither the QEMU build nor the distro repos are reliable enough to
> allow me to just "go back in time" and rebuild at any moment, I need to
> keep the artifacts cached to avoid rebuilding. Otherwise it comes time
> to send a PR and I discover that some python piece has changed or the
> distro messed up the older repository.

Yes, in general building old QEMU on new distros periodically
hits trouble.  If building old QEMU, better reliability is
achieved by using a distro release that was from the same
timeframe as QEMU.  Is using containers targetting such old
distro versions not an option ? The tests/docker/dockerfiles
from the old QEMU branch ought to work ?

Our stable release branches have the same needs, and their
CI is using the container images from the old branches.

How far back in time do you need/want to go for migration
testing ?  Is it sufficient to merely target versions for
which mjt is still doing active maint work, so we can
expect the containers to still work.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com       ~~        https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org          ~~          https://entangle-photo.org :|
|: https://pixelfed.art/berrange   ~~    https://fstop138.berrange.com :|



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14 23:58 [RFC] container images for migration-test Fabiano Rosas
2026-10-08 23:40 ` Peter Xu
2026-10-09 12:58   ` Fabiano Rosas
2026-10-09 15:09     ` Alex Bennée
2026-10-09  0:48 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2026-10-09 19:36   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2026-10-10 23:19   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2026-10-12  8:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asyX0JccFfG0ZMDp@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.