From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Four function buttons on DELL Latitude X200
Date: 9 Dec 2002 11:33:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <at2r5v$fib$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E18LBeK-00046y-00@calista.inka.de
Followup to: <E18LBeK-00046y-00@calista.inka.de>
By author: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> In article <m3d6ocjd81.fsf@Janik.cz> you wrote:
> > this patch add support for four functions key on DELL Latitude X200.
>
> we need a more generic appoach to handle those key codes for various
> extensions. I think a pure software reconfiguration of the keymaps or a
> daemon trakcing the raw codes is fine. Perhaps we can make something like a
> hook into the kernel where all untrapped function keys are send to in raw
> format?
>
The PC only has so many possible keycodes (with E0 and E1 it's still
in the sub-300 range.) It won't fit within 128, but I would really
like an algorithmic mapping from scancodes to keycodes so we don't
continue to have this problem.
For example, using a 16-bit keycode model:
Scancode Keycode (binary)
mxxxxxxx m0000000 0xxxxxxx
E0 mxxxxxxx m0000000 1xxxxxxx
E1 mxxxxxxx yyyyyyyy mxxxxxxx yyyyyyyy
m = make/break bit
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-08 23:35 PATCH: Four function buttons on DELL Latitude X200 Pavel Janík
2002-12-09 0:19 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-12-09 19:33 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2002-12-10 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-11 22:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-13 16:22 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2002-12-12 1:01 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-12-12 8:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-12-12 11:48 ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2002-12-12 11:51 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-12-12 12:17 ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2002-12-12 12:20 ` Vojtech Pavlik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='at2r5v$fib$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.