From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs, or JGit fail to install
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:13:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <at79nEHLDrcoCgn_@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2403.v2.git.git.1792774249888.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 04:50:49PM +0000, Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> Changes in v2:
>
> * Perforce, git-lfs, and JGit install failures now fail the build
> instead of being silently swallowed. Removed the presence checks and
> warnings at the end of the script, dead code once install failure is
> fatal.
Thanks for adapting!
> diff --git a/ci/install-dependencies.sh b/ci/install-dependencies.sh
> index d57dce5663..dad35db78b 100755
> --- a/ci/install-dependencies.sh
> +++ b/ci/install-dependencies.sh
> @@ -95,21 +95,33 @@ ubuntu-*|i386/ubuntu-*|debian-*)
> "$P4WHENCE/bin.linux26x86_64/p4d" \
> "$P4WHENCE/bin.linux26x86_64/p4" &&
> chmod a+x "$CUSTOM_PATH/p4d" "$CUSTOM_PATH/p4" || {
> - rm -f "$CUSTOM_PATH/p4"
> - rm -f "$CUSTOM_PATH/p4d"
> + echo >&2 "error: could not install perforce"
> + exit 1
> }
> + echo "$(tput setaf 6)Perforce Server Version$(tput sgr0)"
> + p4d -V
> + echo "$(tput setaf 6)Perforce Client Version$(tput sgr0)"
> + p4 -V
Okay. I was wondering whether we'd even see these binaries or whether
we'd have to `"${CUSTOM_PATH}"/p4d -V` instead. But `$CUSTOM_PATH` gets
set up in "ci/lib.sh" already, so there's no need for that.
> wget --quiet \
> "$LFSWHENCE/git-lfs-linux-amd64-$LINUX_GIT_LFS_VERSION.tar.gz" &&
> tar -xzf "git-lfs-linux-amd64-$LINUX_GIT_LFS_VERSION.tar.gz" \
> -C "$CUSTOM_PATH" --strip-components=1 \
> "git-lfs-$LINUX_GIT_LFS_VERSION/git-lfs" &&
> - rm "git-lfs-linux-amd64-$LINUX_GIT_LFS_VERSION.tar.gz" ||
> - rm -f "$CUSTOM_PATH/git-lfs"
> + rm "git-lfs-linux-amd64-$LINUX_GIT_LFS_VERSION.tar.gz" || {
> + echo >&2 "error: could not install git-lfs"
> + exit 1
> + }
This could all be a bit less convoluted if we had `set -e` in
"ci/lib.sh". But that certainly is outside the scope of this patch
series, so meanwhile this looks good to me.
> @@ -121,9 +133,16 @@ macos-*)
>
> mkdir -p "$CUSTOM_PATH"
> wget -q "$P4WHENCE/bin.macosx12arm64/helix-core-server.tgz" &&
> - tar -xf helix-core-server.tgz -C "$CUSTOM_PATH" p4 p4d &&
> + tar -xf helix-core-server.tgz -C "$CUSTOM_PATH" p4 p4d || {
> + echo >&2 "error: could not install perforce"
> + exit 1
> + }
> sudo xattr -d com.apple.quarantine "$CUSTOM_PATH/p4" "$CUSTOM_PATH/p4d" 2>/dev/null || true
This line is a bit curious, it makes me wonder whether we want to
tighten it as well now. Any reason why we wouldn't?
> rm helix-core-server.tgz
Nit: this is inconsistent with git-lfs, where we also have the call to
rm as part of the condition chain.
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 14:38 [PATCH] ci: only warn about perforce/git-lfs/JGit on platforms that need them Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-09-25 19:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 12:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-28 16:13 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-23 16:50 ` [PATCH v2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs, or JGit fail to install Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-23 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-23 22:59 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-23 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-26 7:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-10-26 7:38 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-26 7:41 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-26 8:07 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-26 8:08 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-26 8:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-26 8:13 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-26 8:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-26 9:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 9:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ci: drop quarantine removal for macos perforce binaries Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 11:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-26 12:18 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-26 12:49 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-26 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-26 9:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs, or JGit fail to install Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 11:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-26 12:17 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-27 8:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-27 8:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ci: drop quarantine removal for macos perforce binaries Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-27 8:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs, or JGit fail to install Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-27 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] ci: fail the build if perforce, git-lfs " Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=at79nEHLDrcoCgn_@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.