From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Rongzheng Wang <testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] xsk: defer software checksum until the skb is complete
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:15:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <at82NLzM7g8HGgum@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261024141157.59301-2-testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 10:11:56PM +0800, Rongzheng Wang wrote:
> When XDP_UMEM_TX_SW_CSUM is used with multi-buffer TX, xsk_skb_metadata()
> calls skb_checksum_help() while only the first descriptor has been added to
> the skb. The checksum therefore covers just the first fragment, and
> skb_checksum_help() sets ip_summed to CHECKSUM_NONE, so the remaining
> fragments are never included in the checksum.
>
> Move the software checksum calculation to the point where the last
> descriptor has been added to the skb.
>
> On a checksum failure the packet is now dropped instead of being returned
> to the application for a retry. This path is not reachable with the
> existing metadata validation, but the behavior change is intentional.
>
> Fixes: 11614723af26 ("xsk: Add option to calculate TX checksum in SW")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rongzheng Wang <testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/xdp/xsk.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index 33475b180ea6..65be2a368325 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -1011,14 +1011,6 @@ static int xsk_skb_metadata(struct sk_buff *skb, void *buffer,
> skb->csum_start = hr + csum_start;
> skb->csum_offset = csum_offset;
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> -
> - if (unlikely(pool->tx_sw_csum)) {
> - int err;
> -
> - err = skb_checksum_help(skb);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - }
> }
>
> if (flags & XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_LAUNCH_TIME)
> @@ -1030,6 +1022,14 @@ static int xsk_skb_metadata(struct sk_buff *skb, void *buffer,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int xsk_skb_sw_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
> +{
> + if (!pool->tx_sw_csum || skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
If i am reading this right check against ip_summed is a way to tell that
first frag had XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_CHECKSUM flag set.
Agreed with Jason to preserve unlikely() when checking pool->tx_sw_csum.
Regarding skb drop, I am leaning towards this, I don't see much sense in
retry when packet is malformed? Not sure how this could be communicated up
to user space.
> + return 0;
> +
> + return skb_checksum_help(skb);
> +}
> +
> static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs,
> struct xdp_desc *desc)
> {
> @@ -1275,6 +1275,12 @@ static int __xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk)
> if (xp_mb_desc(&desc)) {
> xs->skb = skb;
> continue;
> + } else {
> + err = xsk_skb_sw_csum(skb, xs->pool);
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + xsk_drop_skb(skb);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> err = __dev_direct_xmit(skb, xs->queue_id);
> --
> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 9:12 [PATCH net] xsk: defer software checksum until the skb is complete Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-24 9:15 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-24 11:35 ` 王荣峥
2026-10-24 12:25 ` Jason Xing
2026-10-24 14:11 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] xsk: fix multi-buffer TX software checksum Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-24 14:11 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] xsk: defer software checksum until the skb is complete Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-25 2:51 ` Jason Xing
2026-10-25 3:43 ` Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-26 11:15 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-10-26 12:34 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-10-26 14:27 ` Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-26 14:31 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-10-24 14:11 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: cover AF_XDP multi-buffer TX software checksum Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-25 14:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-25 14:46 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-26 14:55 ` Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-24 14:15 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] xsk: fix " netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=at82NLzM7g8HGgum@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=testwrzwrz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.