All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	 "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	 Alexander Motin <alexander.motin@truenas.com>,
	Ameer Hamza <ameer.hamza@truenas.com>,
	 "Caleb St. John" <caleb.stjohn@truenas.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: track the perf mlock gift separately
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:09:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atCYFpm63elRyuw7@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015075817.GO2009045@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 09:58:17AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 05:29:07PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:

> > Resolve the issue by simply giving perf its own field separate from the
> > rest.
>
> So I'm a little confused by all this -- perf introduced this field,
> others jumped on and shit broke, so we fix perf instead of the others?

Yeah I think the blame really lies with the later users, and that send a trend
that led to further confusion (including myself, mea culpa!)

> Anyway, patch seems straight forward enough; and you added comment to
> the fields, which I suppose does clarify things some.
>
> I'll take it. Thanks!

Thanks, much appreciated! :)

--
Cheers, Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-03 16:29 [PATCH] perf/core: track the perf mlock gift separately Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-03 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15  7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-15  9:09   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-10-15  9:27     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-10-15 10:40       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atCYFpm63elRyuw7@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.motin@truenas.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ameer.hamza@truenas.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=caleb.stjohn@truenas.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.