Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/zh_CN: remove translator-related headers

[Weijie Yuan <wy@wyuan.org>]

On 2026-10-17 10:06:39 +0800, Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn> wrote:

> On 10/17/26 12:52 AM, Weijie Yuan wrote:
> > The headers related to translators and proofreaders appear multiple
> > times in our directory. Their information is duplicated with that in the
> > commit logs, making it difficult to maintain over an extended period
> > of time, as there have been multiple instances of requests to update the
> > email address.
> > 
> > Remove all the related fields to make our source clean.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Weijie Yuan <wy@wyuan.org>
> > ---
> > The diffs are inconvenient to review, sorry. Because I cannot find a
> > better way to split them up besides by directories.
> 
> 1. I recommend to preserve the RST anchors because other files would use
> this.

Yes, I also removed some top-level labels while I was at it, though I
would better have done that in a separate patch. (My Git index was messy
with these large diff. So later, the topic was expanded to a cleanup.
But yes, I should split it)

But I checked that none of these removed labels are referenced
elsewhere, if I was doing it correctly. (No invalid citations were
reported by 'make htmldocs'.)

Anyway, I'll not touch these labels in next re-roll.

> 2. There are three checkpatch SPDX warnings during the review:
> 
> dev-tools/sparse.rst | Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in
> line 1
> process/howto.rst | Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line
> 1
> process/kernel-enforcement-statement.rst | Missing or malformed
> SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1
> 
> Each warning is triggered because the patch changes that file´s first line.
> All three files already lacked an SPDX tag before the patch.

Oh, I forgot to mention this when writing cover lettter, sorry I did
send these emails a bit too hastily.

I did run checkpatch and got these reminders.

The original Engish versions of these three are missing
SPDX-License-Identifier(s), so as far as I know, our translation is
better not to add this first.?

Please see: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/87y0dv1wp3.fsf@trenco.lwn.net/

But I guess we could add the identifier with Alex's and Yanteng's ack,
as they are the original translator if we want to.

Thanks!


p.s. Many of the recipients' addresses are no longer in use. To avoid
unnecessary clutter, I will simplify the list of recipients in the next
version.