From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8B938F950 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792260252; cv=none; b=IWHAVAEefOApBMbI+I830RvD7TUnQ0OIXS15n2IsDLpMD1z8KEX24Vw5xeKN2Lfd9Wu3NycVVsjJ49tF5/MGjU75+2LD3dtae3vd7v4TMPSPgWc49B47xqsZoGUu87e8sCBsji9Ec6JJiJTmpKawg5N5ufRsDOE/xlsPVMhb8eM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792260252; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nsvFWzJreNgGiRp694xBMZzDpE+ugrA1dHXFiU9pIRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tJnATrrz6JN0F7ZkSzsdiUA6RG76xRyvbZXvMNkoSWDCcoI2W4YZ2pM+66eO9za1PYQyNhp03JG9VlAChnKAhqJiikH866S9X4Za38NxQUvij9QXTpns0DJCl4hJTAmMzvpTVPGhCZUCeiVMImhRui1tLoMkmUd4BNzo/dA0LEI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b=UCSf44MN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b="UCSf44MN" Received: from macsyma.thunk.org (pool-173-48-111-190.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.111.190]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 69HI3rZ3013060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 17 Oct 2026 14:03:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1792260235; bh=VLRBjjbMGL8eXUemniaJks9UPXo1eEsQUoQeI3w6Ro4=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UCSf44MNe2ddwdtAn2ty2Qzqzg6s+9vwQ1zb1gZgToVYM1X2LOrZ5tfckiJvzcABC jlnDbudNyBX4gA9x5KXUwpoRe7jGBT9qYi33tOcRHXmdkMI7fcPRl70enhLLvde41N qcyCVhHWrxm8ZYWkzHu1SwPc963mI3s1gbM29e4FmWan0x/lW00cmuYd04RRo5Trlp Ie6+zgW1wLYt8FRjEpmpKVz7kbcytYqT18IXAhbUuTQ3APfhLGp7ElHyIvWtu1GdcR Cpgqsef+Urv86fAM57rQaI4xrk6vIqUg7Gli8Eg1cOq1/bctRhWqrU+ufxjJLog7qF 0QrkWq2vi/8zw== Received: by macsyma.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 682B8215E605; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 14:02:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 14:02:53 -0400 From: "Theodore Tso" To: Jiri Kosina Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev, sashiko@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: Patch pre-submission to Sashiko Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 07:28:48PM -0500, Jiri Kosina wrote: > I have just received a v1 to v11 patchset submission within roughly one > day timeframe. > > Neither myself nor anyone else did comment with any review feedback, > except for Sashiko. Which I believe is what triggered all the immediate > resubmissions. What some subsystem maintainers have requested is delay sashiko reviews from being sent out by some fixed time, such as 24 hours. One approach which might want to explore is an exponential backoff. > Another option I'd like to propose would be to introduce a way for > submitters to run patches through back-and-forth with Sashiko even before > properly submitting the Sashiko-polished v1 to maintainers and > mailinglists. It's not that hard for people to set up a local Sashiko. and then use either an local LLM, or their own cloud-hosted AI tokens. Perhaps that's something we can encourage. - Ted