From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Also re-enqueue stranded tasks with scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task()
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 01:06:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atP_f5S5v_1V06L2@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261017223738.993262-4-tj@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 12:37:38PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> scan_shared_dsq() rescues a task stranded on SHARED_DSQ or HIGHPRI_DSQ by
> moving it to the rescue path with scx_bpf_dsq_move(). For a task with an odd
> pid, mark it with scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task() instead, which sends it back
> through qmap_enqueue() and its rescue, so that both kfuncs are exercised.
>
> scan_shared_dsq() runs from qmap_dispatch() and from the monitor timer, so
> the kfunc can be called both with the dispatch rq locked and with no rq lock
> held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c b/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c
> index 61143a2d79f8..e8e451be862d 100644
> --- a/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c
> @@ -651,10 +651,35 @@ static void update_core_sched_head_seq(struct task_struct *p)
> qa.core_sched_head_seqs[idx] = taskc->core_sched_seq;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Send @p, stranded on the DSQ @it iterates, to the kernel rescue path. To
> + * exercise both kfuncs, move tasks with an even pid there with
> + * scx_bpf_dsq_move() and re-enqueue the others with scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task(),
> + * which takes them through qmap_enqueue()'s rescue. The choice is per task so
> + * that a marked task isn't moved by another scan before the re-enqueue reaches
> + * it.
> + */
> +static __always_inline void rescue_stranded(struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq *it,
> + struct task_struct *p, task_ctx_t *taskc)
> +{
> + s32 c;
> +
> + if (p->pid & 1) {
nit: if ((p->pid & 1) && __COMPAT_has_dsq_reenq_task())
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> + scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task(it, p);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + c = cmask_next_set_wrap(&taskc->cpus_allowed, 0);
> + if (c >= 0 && c < scx_bpf_nr_cids()) {
> + __sync_fetch_and_add(&qa.nr_rescue_dsp, 1);
> + scx_bpf_dsq_move(it, p, SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON | c, SCX_ENQ_RESCUE);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * One pass over SHARED_DSQ: rescue stranded tasks and boost highpri ones. A
> * task whose cids were lost while it was queued in the fifos would strand on
> - * SHARED_DSQ, which is consumed only on self cids it can't run on - move it to
> + * SHARED_DSQ, which is consumed only on self cids it can't run on - send it to
> * the kernel rescue path. One whose cids were lost after the highpri cull is
> * likewise rescued out of HIGHPRI_DSQ below.
> *
> @@ -663,9 +688,9 @@ static void update_core_sched_head_seq(struct task_struct *p)
> * consuming them first. This makes minor difference only when dsp_batch is
> * larger than 1.
> *
> - * scx_bpf_dsq_move[_vtime]() are allowed both from ops.dispatch() and
> - * non-rq-lock holding BPF programs. As demonstration, this function is called
> - * from qmap_dispatch() and monitor_timerfn().
> + * scx_bpf_dsq_move[_vtime]() and scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task() are allowed both from
> + * ops.dispatch() and non-rq-lock holding BPF programs. As demonstration, this
> + * function is called from qmap_dispatch() and monitor_timerfn().
> */
> static bool scan_shared_dsq(bool from_timer)
> {
> @@ -677,19 +702,13 @@ static bool scan_shared_dsq(bool from_timer)
> bpf_for_each(scx_dsq, p, SHARED_DSQ, 0) {
> static u64 highpri_seq;
> task_ctx_t *taskc;
> - s32 c;
>
> if (!(taskc = lookup_task_ctx(p)))
> return false;
>
> /* stranded? rescue - it can't be dispatched here either way */
> if (!cmask_intersects(&taskc->cpus_allowed, &qa.self_cids.mask)) {
> - c = cmask_next_set_wrap(&taskc->cpus_allowed, 0);
> - if (c >= 0 && c < scx_bpf_nr_cids()) {
> - __sync_fetch_and_add(&qa.nr_rescue_dsp, 1);
> - scx_bpf_dsq_move(BPF_FOR_EACH_ITER, p, SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON | c,
> - SCX_ENQ_RESCUE);
> - }
> + rescue_stranded(BPF_FOR_EACH_ITER, p, taskc);
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -723,19 +742,12 @@ static bool scan_shared_dsq(bool from_timer)
> &qa.usable_cids.mask,
> this_cid + 1);
> if (cid >= nr_cids) {
> - s32 c;
> -
> /* self cids lack caps in effect yet, leave it queued */
> if (cmask_intersects(&taskc->cpus_allowed, &qa.self_cids.mask))
> continue;
>
> /* stranded after the cull - rescue it from here */
> - c = cmask_next_set_wrap(&taskc->cpus_allowed, 0);
> - if (c >= 0 && c < nr_cids) {
> - __sync_fetch_and_add(&qa.nr_rescue_dsp, 1);
> - scx_bpf_dsq_move(BPF_FOR_EACH_ITER, p, SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON | c,
> - SCX_ENQ_RESCUE);
> - }
> + rescue_stranded(BPF_FOR_EACH_ITER, p, taskc);
> continue;
> }
>
> --
> 2.56.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 22:37 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task() Tejun Heo
2026-10-17 22:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched_ext: Factor out the rq lock switch of scx_dsq_move() Tejun Heo
2026-10-17 22:52 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-17 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task() to re-enqueue single tasks from a DSQ iteration Tejun Heo
2026-10-17 23:01 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-17 23:35 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-10-17 22:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Also re-enqueue stranded tasks with scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task() Tejun Heo
2026-10-17 23:06 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-10-17 23:35 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-18 6:14 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-17 23:43 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_dsq_reenq_task() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atP_f5S5v_1V06L2@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.