From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
ja@ssi.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/15] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: only queue icmp echo request/reply
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:23:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atWbR8bVksGgCcSZ@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179237288160.3135.9206589655813468272@kernel.org>
netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org <netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org> wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
> issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
> you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.
>
> Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:
>
> - [Low] The commit fixes a reproducible flake in the bridge NFQUEUE
> selftest (about one failure a day in NIPA), but its message has no…
>
> --
>
> selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: only queue icmp echo request/reply
>
> The patch changes the ipv4 nfq rule in load_ruleset() so it only queues
> icmp echo request/reply, which the icmpv6 rule already does. ICMP time
> exceeded messages left over after the stress test no longer inflate the
> bridge queue packet counts.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
>
> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but should this have a Fixes: tag?
Not really. Was only ever caught by netdev CI which already
carries this fix locally.
> The flake looks like it started with:
>
> commit 8a2cfe7951f6 ("selftests: nft_queue.sh: add a bridge queue test")
Yes.
> Would something like this be worth adding?
>
> Fixes: 8a2cfe7951f6 ("selftests: nft_queue.sh: add a bridge queue test")
I'm not sure its worth doing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 4:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 0:56 [PATCH net-next 00/15] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] netfilter: disable br_netfilter in user namespaces Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 1:03 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-18 1:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 9:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: only queue icmp echo request/reply Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 4:23 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-10-19 9:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] ipvs: fix buffer overflow when sending sync messages Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] netfilter: nf_queue: limit the hook drop flush to the unregistered hook point Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 4:49 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-19 9:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue: check the scope of the hook drop flush Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 4:54 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] netfilter: conntrack: fix unlikely UaF in gc worker Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] netfilter: nf_tables: switch chain_types array to rcu Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 5:00 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] netfilter: nft_exthdr: remove redundant op parsing in tcp_set_init Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] netfilter: nft_exthdr: avoid 60 bytes stack buffer in TCP option mangling Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 9:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] selftests: netfilter: fix return value in zone subtest Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] netfilter: nft_compat: restrict raw table targets/matches Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 5:17 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] netfilter: flowtable: set inner protocol when popping tunnel header Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-19 1:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 9:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] netfilter: flowtable: populate tunnel tuple regardless of inner protocol Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] netfilter: flowtable: add encap_proto to flow_offload_tunnel Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-18 0:56 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] netfilter: flowtable: unify tunnel push for IPv4 and IPv6 Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atWbR8bVksGgCcSZ@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.