From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: rds_wq UAF
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 15:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atdoGiW_sHlWgOwt@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42964fa071bd8dcafd418c89be6d66856def4dc5.camel@kernel.org>
(change subject)
On 10/19, Allison Henderson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2026-10-19 at 17:35 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > But. rds_init() can also fail even if CONFIG_SYSCTL=y, after
> > > rds_sysctl_init(), so to me this looks like a bug in net/rds/.
> > >
>
> Yes that's a separate bug, so I'll send a separate fix for that.
Let me try to summarize.
If rds_init() fails after rds_threads_init() for any reason,
rds_threads_exit() will destroy/free rds_wq.
If rds_rdma_init() is called after that, and rds_ib_init() fails
after rds_ib_mr_init(), rds_ib_unregister_client() will try to
flush the already freed rds_wq.
But we have
module_init(rds_init); // net/rds/af_rds.c
module_init(rds_rdma_init); // net/rds/rdma_transport.c
and IIUC the order of these initcalls is not defined. So if
rds_rdma_init() -> rds_ib_init() is called before rds_init(), it
can do flush_workqueue(rds_wq) when rds_wq == NULL on failure.
With or without CONFIG_SYSCTL. Right?
But it seems that rds_ib_init() doesn't need to flush rds_wq on failure,
so how about the patch below? Of course, I have no idea if net/rds has
more similar issues with rds_wq.
Oleg.
---
diff --git a/net/rds/ib.c b/net/rds/ib.c
index 786f39169bc1..cde2d1bfabbd 100644
--- a/net/rds/ib.c
+++ b/net/rds/ib.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ int rds_ib_init(void)
out_sysctl:
rds_ib_sysctl_exit();
out_ibreg:
- rds_ib_unregister_client();
+ ib_unregister_client(&rds_ib_client);
out_mr_exit:
rds_ib_mr_exit();
out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 1:46 [linus:master] [sysctl] 8d75c338f0: BUG:KASAN:slab-use-after-free_in_touch_wq_lockdep_map kernel test robot
2026-10-19 11:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 13:30 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-19 14:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 15:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 19:52 ` Allison Henderson
2026-10-20 9:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 10:51 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 10:43 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 11:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 13:09 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-10-20 9:06 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 9:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 7:55 ` Joel Granados
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atdoGiW_sHlWgOwt@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.