From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: disable TX checksum offload for jumbo frames on bugged cores
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:33:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <athAoWfW-xesPhFP@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ca537e7-c9a3-4306-a2f4-9c7d57123bfc@lunn.ch>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Here I want to query a generic rule from netdev maintainers:
> > > can XDP frame enable HW checksum on dwmac IP? Per my understanding, the
> > > dwmac can only do HW checksum for normal particular packets layouts, such as
> > > TCP, UDP. What about if XDP transmits a non-IP frame?
> >
> > or a generic XDP guide from netdev maintainers:
> > Since XDP can tranmist arbitrary Eth frames, so how does the eth driver cope
> > with HW checksum if the HW checksum is intended for supported IP packet
> > layouts rather than arbitrary layer2 frames?
> >
> > choices:
> > c1. Simply disabled HW checksum by default. Then XDP prog must provide
> > checksums themselves, lost the HW offload cap for IP packets.
> >
> > c2. detect the frame in eth driver's xdp code path, then enable/disable
> > HW checksum accordingly. Then how? Any example in exisiting eth drivers
> > is appreciated.
>
> Why is this specific to XDP? Cannot the network stack transmit
> arbitrary layer2 frames? Isn't this a generic problem?
>
network stack normal tx supplies the skb->ip_summed metadata, and
dwmac driver specifically can decide to enable/disable HW csum
by checking the protocol which is extraced from skb, example
stmmac_has_ip_ethertype()
But XDP path doesn't have the necessary metadata, and I'm not sure
whether stmmac_has_ip_ethertype xdb version can be implemented or
not. That's the reason I request generic XDP guidence from netdev
maintainers.
correct me if I misunderstood something.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 15:24 [PATCH net-next 0/2] stmmac: some XDP fixes in XDP_TX path Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-12 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: fix XDP TX DMA address for compound RX pages Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-12 19:43 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-12 20:47 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-13 7:54 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-13 15:27 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13 15:40 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-16 14:13 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-10-12 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: disable TX checksum offload for jumbo frames on bugged cores Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-13 15:27 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13 15:33 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 13:40 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-20 13:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-16 14:18 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-10-20 0:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-10-20 3:08 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-10-20 12:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-21 4:33 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-12 15:30 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] stmmac: some XDP fixes in XDP_TX path netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-12 15:52 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-19 13:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=athAoWfW-xesPhFP@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.