From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dsterba@suse.com,
hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
terrelln@fb.com, tglx@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/lib: Use REP MOVSB for large memcpy() on ERMS CPUs without FSRM
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:54:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atiKeB-76nOj-ztU@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261017192727.2760919-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 12:27:25PM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> index 12a23fa7c44c5..6b3e203b6087c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> @@ -31,9 +31,10 @@
> * which the compiler could/should do much better anyway.
> */
> SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(__memcpy)
> - ALTERNATIVE "jmp memcpy_orig", "", X86_FEATURE_FSRM
> + /* The FSRM destination move shares the space used by the ERMS jump. */
> + ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp memcpy_orig", "jmp memcpy_erms", X86_FEATURE_ERMS, \
> + "movq %rdi, %rax", X86_FEATURE_FSRM
>
> - movq %rdi, %rax
Moving MOVQ inside ALTERNATIVE_2 is ugly...
And it only turns a 5-byte NOP into a 2-byte one on FSRM.
What is the point?
> movq %rdx, %rcx
> rep movsb
> RET
> @@ -171,3 +172,11 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(memcpy_orig)
> RET
> SYM_FUNC_END(memcpy_orig)
>
> +SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(memcpy_erms)
> + cmpq $2048, %rdx
> + jb memcpy_orig
> + movq %rdi, %rax
> + movq %rdx, %rcx
> + rep movsb
> + RET
> +SYM_FUNC_END(memcpy_erms)
Copies below 2048 now take two jumps to reach memcpy_orig() instead of
one, and David's point is that nearly all kernel copies are that small.
Can the check go in memcpy_orig() after the existing 32-byte compare?
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 10:04 [PATCH] x86/lib: Use REP MOVSB for large memcpy() on ERMS CPUs without FSRM Usama Arif
2026-10-15 10:39 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-10-17 19:27 ` Usama Arif
2026-10-21 9:54 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-10-21 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-10-22 8:49 ` David Laight
2026-11-02 23:03 ` Usama Arif
2026-11-03 8:32 ` David Laight
2026-11-03 14:14 ` Usama Arif
2026-11-03 22:13 ` David Laight
2026-11-03 22:44 ` Usama Arif
2026-10-17 21:42 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atiKeB-76nOj-ztU@thinkstation \
--to=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=terrelln@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.