From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792613820; b=neX04iU3AMS8AWeFpQaiXaQE8MvWeQ+TM57LkXxQjCwSfcW+zA+Xr3sY+m8BsCYAp9Rm KX1qj/2Dzfd+2zPuHxaRD79V327CSnyFJBuwpLO5fE6Qit/77KEqFnJFwm2tYjcQDIbEb 8vV8f0ApjaNUUnHxKVIfCfpAKGMGTWhzt9VQXdNQ0/Q/iVEyGg3W6RRD1UZPf/q/eSWem qwEUx7+mKaRJDO5IjQRzFOYtmhnyfNtKczB6JYHItv28fe0ImCbwzhUzPLGusaSNVFNhu I8YyKpdgMuRCSAO3nfCiExlHGeUEe+tcE1/bI8FpWVgCS+cWkuORYhQWpg/N9ixBltw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792613820; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:X-MC-Unique: X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID:Received:Received:Received:Received:Date:From: To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By:X-Mimecast-Spam-Score:X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: X-Mimecast-Originator:Content-Type:Content-Disposition; bh=n+GGmqqba6HQAuCkAQ2r2Q77aSfO55edxcx3o43LGGM=; b=g90Io/elckj9AmV2Y93ncKb2PJHvMsQB6JDjg2ey+1rByCr5sxDwyhsNy1Vwj8mb7/o9 t/fG4pZxziKEpBjWeHU9feRkCf+rniTL0cuV+1GYsDsN8/qeTKrp+Y+EmNAio1Tf0YdC1 1/hLne1n68DhPZg0AcZE+QwDi84hmvePU2ZrSMW2hDxvqrP6Iy5Hw+ROYvjYiB1S9qM08 hDH/7ohLoA8Agm6qwQp7flBQOfsWVObSNJXD2GYFHqk4nKKb9B+I4cpZxoChTGLH1WSfx Qsy5qRQgmqam6GAHcXH3Y5MLTo0PbNwiP9biYlGZfL/v1uzauyuqaBRAJo00RPuEDsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=KL7XAK1k; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5776E606A31A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:17:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 5776E606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=KL7XAK1k DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1792613819; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n+GGmqqba6HQAuCkAQ2r2Q77aSfO55edxcx3o43LGGM=; b=KL7XAK1kvPCPEDfG7DEQW9T/ZjwfWgxtjuLyqJ3IZ3kaLsqxzJdVc6u2WZqSUHFrGpaVZI 2dDQuTXYqEsC1gt47BQ1omOlzCfQ8daHaoFtqASeZESB2fNUsIxuNvRaNX2kDq3MlDkjrx mEdaYgE37LZWoQofKRE06K5byULfXn4= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-241-UCeNWNOlOgqgXi1QmStDgw-1; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:16:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: UCeNWNOlOgqgXi1QmStDgw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: UCeNWNOlOgqgXi1QmStDgw_1792613814 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486F11955E85; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bmarzins-01.fast.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (bmarzins-01.fast.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com [10.6.23.12]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E527E1956042; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bmarzins-01.fast.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmarzins-01.fast.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (8.18.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 69LKGqlM074432 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:16:52 -0400 Received: (from bmarzins@localhost) by bmarzins-01.fast.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 69LKGqXb074431; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:16:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:16:52 -0400 From: Benjamin Marzinski To: Eric Biggers Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Mikulas Patocka Subject: Re: Enabling Sashiko for dm-devel? Message-ID: References: <20261021173943.GF1879@quark> X-Mailing-List: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20261021173943.GF1879@quark> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: yDfSAWHmrMLmiTvunmzqfqUQCPHxkz4dqTf3VcGcMv0_1792613814 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 10:39:43AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > Currently, Sashiko doesn't monitor dm-devel or send email replies to it > (https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml). > > Sometimes Sashiko reviews for device-mapper patches can be found on > https://sashiko.dev anyway, due to the patches also being Cc'ed to > linux-kernel which is monitored. However, get_maintainer.pl is being > updated to no longer suggest Cc'ing linux-kernel. > > Would there be any objection to enabling monitoring and email replies > for dm-devel, like this which various other lists already use?: > > ["dm-devel@lists.linux.dev"] > reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"] > > If the dm maintainers prefer monitoring-only (no emails), that could be > done instead. But I think the email replies are really helpful. Sounds good, and I think emailing when issues are found is fine. I'll go open a Pull Request to add this. Thanks -Ben > > - Eric