From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading)
Date: 16 Dec 2002 15:50:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atlorc$sds$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: FKEAJLBKJCGBDJJIPJLJAEOLDLAA.scott@coyotegulch.com
Followup to: <FKEAJLBKJCGBDJJIPJLJAEOLDLAA.scott@coyotegulch.com>
By author: "Scott Robert Ladd" <scott@coyotegulch.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> From what I can see, HT provides a 0-15% increase in performance, depending
> heavily on the type of code being run. In other words, HT helps, but it is
> *no* substitute for true multiple processors. And it is ONLY of value when
> an SMP kernel is in use.
>
It would be interesting to compare an UP kernel with HT off to an SMP
kernel with the HT on...
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-16 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200212160004.gBG04g130091@hera.kernel.org>
2002-12-16 2:34 ` [XFS] add missing file xfs_iomap.c Anders Gustafsson
2002-12-16 3:58 ` /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 4:02 ` Robert Love
2002-12-16 4:13 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 6:28 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-12-16 6:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-12-16 13:38 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 13:54 ` Brian Jackson
2002-12-16 14:10 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-16 14:56 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 15:11 ` Måns Rullgård
2002-12-16 15:44 ` HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 22:38 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-12-16 23:21 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 23:27 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-12-17 11:03 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-17 20:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-16 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2002-12-17 19:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-16 15:52 ` /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Andrew Theurer
2002-12-16 14:08 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-16 14:36 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-16 4:39 ` [XFS] add missing file xfs_iomap.c Linus Torvalds
[not found] <1_0212161441436926@cichlid.com>
2002-12-18 17:56 ` HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Andrew Burgess
2002-12-19 22:04 ` J.A. Magallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='atlorc$sds$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.