From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792791115; b=YbgsxfUGbYFNE02s+nKrEBzWCapxpW+IfdXtNuvAWfIbh1cDbC7SRCjdj2BY1ICsoMA6 Bwlq+aSnDZaUO1ENHVUAhkrOQkwZilXAKZL/GrxmjSI4y9NkxHbJWhL8E7rJ8XsvGntw4 LbERFZX6Wti5DUvNbvMhG7882ypxJEiCIuwvJ+sOHa2sFMl3yWt3dMaqyZ6d+1/QlpnQN BHXkjLIa1vClOXRvtoejpER+fxEwmuJfW3dk2+pe4LwyPIFt+BdzQy49qWAXmc48mGLVS HVxuVnzwt0GwlqrytKsIsU4t66KKcxdjQ4e5zpICgDHYSXvoWa3H6Kh+SbD9T0ZiM+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792791115; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=C35oPVKloVYdNLD5sVgcwxBecgSs0pgBZuAOJibDvI4=; b=B3yICPG0LldK4BAM2WjUxwQnGuQycW+QXQWSuhk2pdyLKLueKEpweID51XaskjVNSUuu Q4qvQftIBvzWNyyqXwi3g8CJ1Y0t7I5+3EFbYVCUeRD3C4GuAJ+qaq0Ey1CTSRpOrgHav LxXgeJyz0PCHtNdgXPev7tMkJBvZotLXeliLlkm45z+2uJ0qeRTsWdjiP7xa1l/K4DiUn g5y1ichhisatWN7wnk8XJJvrhQpH5PeF40EHhFnLA8a9c6FFTuwzNlc5APO0E6xuyKIpv RvRlruBeGejm3+VmpqZG1Ne7+JkG41hRVvj4zvPBGIrcYVtRW7xv92pPD00ND84c/fA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=H7VCKA6v; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496D9606A31A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 21:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=H7VCKA6v Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A97371F01825; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 21:31:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792791114; bh=C35oPVKloVYdNLD5sVgcwxBecgSs0pgBZuAOJibDvI4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=H7VCKA6v6t9AqxnX6kgyP6r7SxS8Myw1Ir3YQB0x72QXtVtI/zRDHz5HHWjjhnlXp RKWnVNLx8u+qzJG/p4B4gyG4O5PKbhvitDdnZplWC4BU+sAMfi6khn73ZJMhyQUaIB C9zVt0ek+GDyoWCDjibJG0gtb6k9LL7NvhbqIvcGZX9FncPbibRovzRpO2k8226+Wx Ohv2Xd60/FNKrbevBkGXRFOviQtddh8Eo7ZE9o+GA0saDh4F0gakTayI1w1aCkcpdK uuC38wsDz7PyAO4NM2TMnyzwe7dCEQGwOa/3qTK88HvO98st7rL0I5ZrR3AhlImJDO bcqIQC45ZWWBg== Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:31:17 -0500 From: Clark Williams To: Wen Yang Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Steven Rostedt , linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.1-rt 00/15] net: Backport backlog-NAPI threads to resolve PREEMPT_RT softirq warning in SMP flush Message-ID: References: <20261014150853.f8I2fNx0@linutronix.de> <20261015133811.PtBdJYyx@linutronix.de> <2c3a8c0f-3820-4531-b179-b2656a7d3c7e@linux.dev> <20261022092536.HVMUjSuS@linutronix.de> <058f0fd4-ed91-4e9b-84db-90e0a3aa5d19@linux.dev> X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <058f0fd4-ed91-4e9b-84db-90e0a3aa5d19@linux.dev> On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 01:42:22AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote: > > > On 10/22/26 17:25, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2026-10-16 14:00:59 [-0500], Clark Williams wrote: > > > Perfect. I expect you'll have a small series for v6.6-rt and then a > > > pretty large one for v6.1-rt. > > > > > > Thanks Wen, I'll be ready to apply/test when you send it. > > > > "[PATCH 03/15] net: napi_schedule_rps() cleanup" has > > > > | commit 8fcb76b934daff12cde76adeab3d502eeb0734b1 upstream. > > > > in the middle of the commit message. > > > > "[PATCH 14/15] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI." has only > > context related changes. > > > > I don't see any SMP-function calls with the series applied. This looks > > complete to me. > > > > > Clark > > > > Sebastian > > Hi Sebastian, hi Clark, > > Thanks for checking and confirming the RPS coverage. > > Clark, would you mind moving the upstream commit reference in patch 03 > to the beginning of the commit message when applying the series? This > would be a message-only correction; the code is unchanged. > > I'm happy to resend if you would prefer an updated series. > Hi Wen, Yes, Please resend an updated series with the reference(s) the way you want them. I'll pull them in, push up up to -next with -rc2 (just to make sure I didn't miss anything) and then go ahead and release it. Clark -- The United States Coast Guard Ruining Natural Selection since 1790