Re: [PATCH] Documentation: propose community voting process

[Weijie Yuan <wy@wyuan.org>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Tuomas Ahola <taahol@utu.fi> writes:
> 
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> I previously mentioned "topic count", but commits are far easier to
> >> count.  So instead of requiring two topics in released versions,
> >> perhaps requiring five commits would be easier to implement and
> >> explain.
> >> 
> >
> > Quoting the summit notes:
> >
> > } * Emily: Have we used a voting process for something like this before?
> > } 
> > } * Patrick: We need proposals and a vote. Who would be allowed to vote?
> > } 
> > } * Peff: Active developers with a track record; perhaps a threshold such
> > }   as 50 merged patches.
> > } 
> >
> > So it seems that Peff's proposed threshold was substantially higher
> > than what has been put forth in this thread.  Any comments on that?
> 
> I do not know which between 50 or 200 is more appropriate, but I
> think these are more realistic threshold.  FWIW, I made the first
> review comment that pointed out that the bar set by Emily's document
> was too low to cross.  The "2 vs 5" you are reacting to was merely
> to point out that commit count would be higher than equivalent topic
> count and without bringing "2 is too low" topic again, which I
> already gave an input to.

Oh, so sorry that I was misreading.