From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Guo Zihao <guozh23@xiaopeng.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Ashley Lai <adlai@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kent Yoder <key@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: check the response size against the buffer size
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:23:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au3w4NDX1Uqz-iqd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106014946.4128696-1-guozh23@xiaopeng.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 09:49:46AM +0800, Guo Zihao wrote:
> The send path validates the transfer size against the size of the
> RTCE buffer:
>
> if (count > ibmvtpm->rtce_size) {
> dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> "Invalid size in send: count=%zd, rtce_size=%d\n",
> count, ibmvtpm->rtce_size);
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> The receive path has no such check: the response length is whatever
> the hypervisor reported in the completion CRQ, and it is only
> compared against the size the caller asked for before being used to
> copy and clear the RTCE buffer:
>
> len = ibmvtpm->res_len;
>
> if (count < len) {
> ...
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
> memcpy((void *)buf, (void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, len);
> memset(ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, 0, len);
>
> A response length larger than the RTCE buffer makes the memcpy read
> past the buffer and the memset clear past it.
>
> Reject a response that does not fit in the RTCE buffer, mirroring
> the check the send path already performs.
>
> Fixes: 132f76294744 ("drivers/char/tpm: Add new device driver to support IBM vTPM")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guo Zihao <guozh23@xiaopeng.com>
> ---
Ditto. I.e, I'm not sure if this is a bug fix or just better validation
for failing components.
Br, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 1:49 [PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: check the response size against the buffer size Guo Zihao
2026-11-06 15:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-11-09 1:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Guo Zihao
2026-11-09 14:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au3w4NDX1Uqz-iqd@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=adlai@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=guozh23@xiaopeng.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=key@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.