All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, sd@queasysnail.net,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tcp: do not coalesce segments after FIN
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 19:38:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <au9-QgRUrLwQSDYl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <au3HMfqNW3_DRMqS@v4bel>

On Fri, 06 Nov 2026 21:25:21 +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> A FIN consumes a sequence number. If another FIN segment is coalesced
> into an skb that already carries FIN, end_seq advances to account for
> the additional FIN, but tcp_flags still contains only one FIN bit.
> 
> When the preceding gap is filled and tcp_ofo_queue() processes the
> coalesced skb, rcv_nxt advances to the skb's end_seq. When the receive
> path consumes all data in the skb, copied_seq advances by the data
> length and one sequence number for FIN. If three or more FIN segments
> have been coalesced into one skb, tcp_inq() can still return a positive
> value after the receive queue becomes empty and the SOCK_DONE adjustment
> is applied.
> 
> TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE is another consumer affected by this state.
> tcp_zerocopy_receive() takes its length from tcp_inq() and follows
> skb->next without checking for the end of the receive queue.
> 
> Software kTLS receive is one consumer affected by this state. When
> strp->copy_mode is false, tls_strp_msg_consume() calls the TCP helper
> tcp_read_done() to consume the current TLS record. In the reproducer,
> tcp_read_done() consumed the record data and one FIN before freeing the
> receive skb.
> 
> When kTLS looked for the next record, tcp_inq() reported at least
> TLS_HEADER_SIZE bytes even though the receive queue was empty.
> tcp_recv_skb() returned NULL, so tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue() hit
> WARN_ON_ONCE() and returned without updating the anchor.
> 
> Since tcp_inq() had reported at least TLS_HEADER_SIZE,
> tls_strp_read_sock() proceeded to tls_strp_check_queue_ok().
> skb_shinfo(strp->anchor)->frag_list still pointed to the freed receive
> skb. tls_strp_check_queue_ok() then read TCP_SKB_CB(first)->seq through
> the stale pointer, causing a use-after-free.
> 
> The reproducer followed this call path:
> 
>   tls_rx_rec_done()
>     tls_strp_msg_consume()
>       tcp_read_done()                       // frees the receive skb
>     tls_strp_check_rcv()
>       tls_strp_read_sock()
>         tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue()   // returns after WARN_ON_ONCE()
>           tcp_recv_skb() == NULL
>         tls_strp_check_queue_ok()
>           TCP_SKB_CB(first)->seq            // reads the freed receive skb
> 
> KASAN reported:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tls_strp_check_queue_ok.isra.0+0x5f/0x100
>   Read of size 4 at addr ffff888103169ca8 by task ktls-server/71
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    ...
>    tls_strp_check_queue_ok.isra.0+0x5f/0x100
>    tls_strp_check_rcv+0x2a9/0x400
>    ...
>    tls_sw_recvmsg+0x3ce/0xa10
>    ...
>    sock_recvmsg+0xea/0x100
>    __sys_recvfrom+0x142/0x1f0
>    ...
>    __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x76/0x90
>    do_syscall_64+0xdd/0x4a0
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>    ...
>    </TASK>
>   ...
>   Freed by task 71:
>    ...
>    napi_skb_cache_put+0x24/0xf0
>    skb_attempt_defer_free+0x183/0x3b0
>    tcp_read_done+0x2d4/0x340
>    tls_strp_msg_consume+0x45/0x80
>    tls_sw_recvmsg+0x3c4/0xa10
>    ...
> 
> In tcp_try_coalesce(), skip coalescing when the destination skb already
> carries FIN. tcp_add_backlog() calls skb_try_coalesce() directly instead
> of using this helper, so add the same check there. Since both paths check
> only the destination skb, a final segment carrying data and FIN can still
> be coalesced into an skb without FIN when the other coalescing checks pass.
> 
> Fixes: e93a0435f809 ("tcp: allow segment with FIN in tcp_try_coalesce()")
> Fixes: 4f693b55c3d2 ("tcp: implement coalescing on backlog queue")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 12:25 [PATCH net v2] tcp: do not coalesce segments after FIN Hyunwoo Kim
2026-11-06 13:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-11-07 19:38 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-11-10 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=au9-QgRUrLwQSDYl@google.com \
    --to=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.