From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
chris@chrisdown.name, Sam Crossley <samuelcrossley@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] netconsole: allow replaying the printk buffer on demand
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:47:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auCraiuMZApQHiNA@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <at-Ppa86sBw7mO8W@gmail.com>
On Mon 2026-10-26 10:49:32, Breno Leitao wrote:
> A bit of context on the use case from our side.
>
> In an ideal world netconsole is enabled from early boot through the
> kernel command line, but in some case this is impossible
> (linux as bootloaders - ipxe/sd-stubs/etc).
>
> The other way to setup netconsole is to create a new target at runtime
> through configfs. Netconsole then only sends messages from the time the
> target is enabled.
>
> For this second case, I would like to replay the whole kernel log on
> netconsole, such as previous messages. Something might have happened
> before the target was enabled, and we want visibility into that.
Just to be sure that I understand it correctly.
Is the netconsole registered before it gets functional, please?
Is it possible to detect that the netconsole is not yet functional
and when it could start working?
I ask because there is the flag CON_PRINTBUFFER which should cause
re-playing all messages on the console during registration.
A solution might be to delay the console registration until
the netwok target is really working.
Another solution might be to temporary block/disable the console
until it gets operational. We already have console_suspend()/resume()
API. But we might need something new to distinguish it from
the system suspend/resume handling.
> That said, the "per-console counter" might work as well, since it would
> start as 0, thus, we know that netconsole target would be behind, and
> try to replay? (not sure how yet)
This is what the console_try_replay_all() does. The only difference
is that it resets the counter to the oldest available message,
see __console_rewind_all(). It is just a small optimization
when the ring buffer is already full and the oldest messages
are gone.
> That said, one way or another might work for our purposes ?!
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 23:06 [PATCH RFC 0/2] netconsole: allow replaying the printk buffer on demand Sam Crossley
2026-10-24 23:06 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] printk: add per-console replay helper Sam Crossley
2026-10-24 23:06 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] netconsole: add configfs trigger to replay printk buffer Sam Crossley
2026-10-26 9:34 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] netconsole: allow replaying the printk buffer on demand John Ogness
2026-10-26 11:44 ` Breno Leitao
2026-10-26 13:09 ` John Ogness
2026-10-26 14:58 ` Petr Mladek
2026-10-26 16:33 ` John Ogness
2026-10-26 17:49 ` Breno Leitao
2026-10-27 13:47 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-10-27 15:54 ` Breno Leitao
2026-10-27 17:45 ` Petr Mladek
2026-10-27 12:58 ` Petr Mladek
2026-10-26 14:39 ` Chris Down
2026-10-26 15:32 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auCraiuMZApQHiNA@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samuelcrossley@gmail.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.