From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@gmail.com>
Cc: Erwan Velu <e.velu@criteo.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
sagi@grimberg.me, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: honor the volatile write cache enable state
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:47:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auI1LR6Ql397Kl2b@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL2JzuzMo3xTMbF6LK97yf6-CB0_NGhr7sGpf69Gv3ONvZQ1KQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Erwan Velu wrote:
> Le mer. 28 oct. 2026 à 17:08, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> a écrit :
> [...]
> > > Considering the performance impact for these type of device,s would you be
> > > open to a backport to stable once merged ?
> >
> > Not sure when a performance improvement is stable worthy. I'm more
> > concerned that doing this is going to expose corruption, but it's what
> > the device is asking for, so fine to introduce it, but stable is
> > questionable.
> If we consider this dangerous for this device, should we add a quirk
> for some devices that could be seen as lying?
Let's just assume spec complaince for now until proven otherwise.
When/if a device is discovered to be quirky on this feature, we can
introduce handling to ignore WCE.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 14:12 [PATCH] nvme: honor the volatile write cache enable state Erwan Velu
2026-10-16 16:57 ` Keith Busch
2026-10-16 17:15 ` Erwan Velu
2026-10-16 17:27 ` Keith Busch
2026-10-16 17:43 ` Erwan Velu
2026-10-16 17:55 ` Keith Busch
2026-10-17 4:25 ` Erwan Velu
2026-10-22 13:27 ` Erwan Velu
2026-10-22 23:17 ` Keith Busch
2026-10-23 14:53 ` Erwan Velu
2026-10-28 16:08 ` Keith Busch
2026-10-28 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-28 17:08 ` Erwan Velu
2026-10-28 17:47 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auI1LR6Ql397Kl2b@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=e.velu@criteo.com \
--cc=erwanaliasr1@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.