From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Brian Bunker <brian@purestorage.com>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] multipathd: verify udev WWIDs with the device before moving paths
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 17:27:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auO6S56Jdjpxh8Bh@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029175727.25457-2-brian@purestorage.com>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 10:57:27AM -0700, Brian Bunker wrote:
> multipathd takes a path's WWID from udev. When a change uevent reports
> a different WWID, uev_update_path() removes the path from its map and
> re-adds it through uev_add_path(), which places it in whatever map owns
> the new WWID. Nothing checks the new value against the device itself;
> recheck_wwid only covers paths coming back up in the checker and
> "multipathd add path". If udev reports the wrong WWID, or the uevent is
> stale by the time it is processed, the path goes into the map of a
> different LUN and I/O for one LUN is silently sent to another.
>
> Use SG_IO to read VPD page 0x83 from the device in two places, for
> paths where can_recheck_wwid() is true:
>
> - In uev_update_path(), if the device still reports the cached WWID,
> ignore the udev value and leave the path where it is.
>
> - In ev_add_path(), refuse to add a path whose WWID the device doesn't
> confirm. The path is orphaned, its WWID is cleared and it is marked
> INIT_MISSING_UDEV, so the checker retriggers udev (bounded by
> retrigger_tries) and the path is re-added from fresh data.
>
> ev_add_path() is the common point for uevent, CLI and checker adds, so
> the second check holds even when the udev data is stale by the time it
> is used. If the SG_IO read fails, behavior is unchanged.
>
> Split the SG_IO read out of check_path_wwid_change() into
> get_sgio_wwid() so all three checks share it.
The code all looks good to me. I must admit, I'm a little paranoid about
forcing perfectly normal ev_add_path() calls to double-check the wwid.
Currently, that only happens if you enable "recheck_wwid", or if
something is going wrong with initializing the path. The issue is that
scsi devices can have multiple wwids, and the multipath code has to be
in sync with the code that udev runs to the wwid, otherwise they can be
different. I don't think these functions differ. I know I've checked
them in the past. But unless there is a problem getting the wwid from
udev or someone turns on recheck_wwid (I don't know how common that is)
paths don't ever run this code.
We could avoid this by hijacking the need_do_map argument to
uev_add_path() and ev_add_path(). If, instead of just being 0 or 1, it
could also be a third value for reinits (we should probably use an enum
in this case), we could only double-check the wwid on reinits, which
only happen when there is an issue getting the wwid from udev.
Thoughts? Am I just being paranoid here?
-Ben
> Signed-off-by: Brian Bunker <brian@purestorage.com>
> ---
> multipathd/main.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
> index 9bce4d6b..656efb6e 100644
> --- a/multipathd/main.c
> +++ b/multipathd/main.c
> @@ -1086,14 +1086,16 @@ handle_path_wwid_change(struct path *pp, struct vectors *vecs)
> return removed;
> }
>
> -bool
> -check_path_wwid_change(struct path *pp)
> +/*
> + * Read the WWID directly from the device with SG_IO, bypassing udev
> + * and sysfs. Returns true and fills in wwid on success.
> + */
> +static bool get_sgio_wwid(struct path *pp, char *wwid)
> {
> - char wwid[WWID_SIZE];
> - int len = 0;
> + int len;
> size_t i;
>
> - if (!strlen(pp->wwid))
> + if (pp->fd < 0)
> return false;
>
> /* Get the real fresh device wwid by sgio. sysfs still has old
> @@ -1111,6 +1113,15 @@ check_path_wwid_change(struct path *pp)
> /* no-op */
> wwid[i] = '\0';
> condlog(4, "%s: Got wwid %s by sgio", pp->dev, wwid);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +bool check_path_wwid_change(struct path *pp)
> +{
> + char wwid[WWID_SIZE];
> +
> + if (!strlen(pp->wwid) || !get_sgio_wwid(pp, wwid))
> + return false;
>
> if (strncmp(wwid, pp->wwid, WWID_SIZE)) {
> condlog(0, "%s: wwid '%s' doesn't match wwid '%s' from device",
> @@ -1121,6 +1132,24 @@ check_path_wwid_change(struct path *pp)
> return false;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * udev reported a new WWID for a path. Returns true if the device
> + * itself still reports old_wwid, in which case the udev value must
> + * not be trusted.
> + */
> +static bool device_kept_wwid(struct path *pp, const char *old_wwid)
> +{
> + char wwid[WWID_SIZE];
> +
> + if (!can_recheck_wwid(pp) || !get_sgio_wwid(pp, wwid) ||
> + strncmp(wwid, old_wwid, WWID_SIZE))
> + return false;
> +
> + condlog(0, "%s: ignoring wwid '%s' from udev, device still reports '%s'",
> + pp->dev, pp->wwid, wwid);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * uev_add_path can call uev_update_path, and uev_update_path can call
> * uev_add_path
> @@ -1315,6 +1344,20 @@ ev_add_path (struct path * pp, struct vectors * vecs, int need_do_map)
> condlog(0, "%s: failed to get path uid", pp->dev);
> goto fail; /* leave path added to pathvec */
> }
> + /*
> + * The WWID normally comes from udev, possibly from an event that
> + * was queued long before we got here. Adding a path to the map
> + * of a different LUN corrupts data, so confirm the WWID with the
> + * device first. On a mismatch, leave the path out and let the
> + * checker retrigger udev to get a fresh WWID.
> + */
> + if (can_recheck_wwid(pp) && check_path_wwid_change(pp)) {
> + condlog(0, "%s: not adding path, wwid '%s' not confirmed by device",
> + pp->dev, pp->wwid);
> + memset(pp->wwid, 0, WWID_SIZE);
> + pp->initialized = INIT_MISSING_UDEV;
> + goto fail;
> + }
> mpp = find_mp_by_wwid(vecs->mpvec, pp->wwid);
> if (mpp && pp->size && mpp->size != pp->size) {
> condlog(0, "%s: failed to add new path %s, device size mismatch", mpp->alias, pp->dev);
> @@ -1702,6 +1745,10 @@ uev_update_path (struct uevent *uev, struct vectors * vecs)
> strcpy(pp->wwid, wwid);
> else if (strlen(wwid) &&
> strncmp(wwid, pp->wwid, WWID_SIZE) != 0) {
> + if (device_kept_wwid(pp, wwid)) {
> + strcpy(pp->wwid, wwid);
> + goto out;
> + }
> condlog(0, "%s: path wwid changed from '%s' to '%s'",
> uev->kernel, wwid, pp->wwid);
> ev_remove_path(pp, vecs, 1);
> --
> 2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 17:57 [PATCH v1 0/1] multipathd: don't trust udev WWIDs when moving paths between maps Brian Bunker
2026-10-29 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] multipathd: verify udev WWIDs with the device before moving paths Brian Bunker
2026-10-29 21:27 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2026-10-29 23:39 ` Brian Bunker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auO6S56Jdjpxh8Bh@redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=brian@purestorage.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.