From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Derek Barbosa <debarbos@redhat.com>,
printk@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2] printk: Avoid multiple unregistration in unregister_console_locked()
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 17:41:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auTI0Dv01budMJv0@pathway> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030135802.663893-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On Fri 2026-10-30 15:03:55, John Ogness wrote:
> unregister_console_locked() is called from within
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(console_list) loops. This would be safe if
> unregister_console_locked() only unregistered the specified console. After
> all, that is what the _safe variant is for.
>
> However, unregister_console_locked() calls printk_kthreads_check_locked(),
> which can unregister _multiple_ consoles if kthreads fail to start. This
> could lead to hlist_for_each_entry_safe() use-after-free scenarios because
> not only was the list entry removed, but possibly the following entry as
> well (the @n temporary storage of the next entry).
>
> Move the call to printk_kthreads_check_locked() outside of
> unregister_console_locked(). Add comments to both functions to clarify
> if they are safe to be used in hlist_for_each_entry_safe(console_list)
> loops.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87ik31iz4x.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de
> Fixes: 76f258bf3f2a ("printk: nbcon: Introduce printer kthreads")
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Now, I am not sure whether to queue this for 7.4-rc2 or 7.5.
One one hand, it is a potential use-after free. On the other hand,
it is rather a corner case which is hard to hit. And it would likely
happen during boot where it is not that dangerous.
Well, I am rather confident with the fix now. So I personally
prefer 7.4-rc2 to be on the safe side sooner. And there are
already two more changes in the queue for 7.4-rc2 anyway.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 13:57 [PATCH printk v2] printk: Avoid multiple unregistration in unregister_console_locked() John Ogness
2026-10-30 16:41 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-10-30 19:48 ` Derek Barbosa
2026-11-03 13:51 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auTI0Dv01budMJv0@pathway \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=debarbos@redhat.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=printk@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.