All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: <netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	<bjorn@kernel.org>, <zuomao338@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 14:18:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auiNskjiMPHTHsf4@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179362404207.3286.3886474571191338888@kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 12:54:02PM +0000, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
> 
>  - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
>    (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
>    the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.

whole series started from report at security ML which included KUnit
reproducer and I verified the issue is real and could be hit with ZC
driver. Part of oops is included in commit message in patch 1.

> 
>  - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
>    mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
>    testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.

Ran xskxceiver's test suite via xsk.py runner on Intel E810-C (ice driver
fw revision 4.70). It does not cover the duplicate fill ring entries but
given the changes based on code inspection this run was to make sure I did
not introduce any regressions around multi-buffer logic.

> 
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
> 
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02 12:49 [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 1/9] xsk: fix list corruption in xsk_buff_add_frag() Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:24     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 2/9] i40e: xsk: fix xsk_buff_add_frag() error handling in Rx Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:29     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 3/9] ice: xsk: fix leaking Rx buffers in multi-buffer path Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 17:22     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 4/9] ice: xsk: do not free in-flight frags on XDP_TX completion Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 5/9] libeth: " Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 6/9] xsk: do not clear frags flag when acquiring a buffer Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 7/9] i40e: xsk: fix multi-buffer XDP_PASS skb construction Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 8/9] ice: xsk: free stashed Rx frame when cleaning the ring Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 9/9] idpf: free stashed XSk Rx frame when releasing the queue Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 12:54 ` [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-02 13:18   ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-11-03  4:48 ` Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auiNskjiMPHTHsf4@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
    --cc=zuomao338@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.