Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] mm/memory-failure: add hwpoison_boot_page() to flag an inherited frame

[Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 08:59:59PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 02:06:17AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:48:43AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > > > > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > > > 
> > > > We've been splitting internal.h to smaller headers, maybe it's time to add
> > > > "memory-faulure.h"?
> > > 
> > > Ack. I'm happy to move the "mm/memory-failure.c" section out of
> > > mm/internal.h into a new mm/memory-failure.h, as preparation for this
> > > patch.
> > > 
> > > Since this patchset is moving slowly, I'll start the header split in
> > > parallel as a separate series, and rebase this patchset on top of it
> > > when I respin. Is it this ok?
> > 
> > Sounds good to me.
> > 
> > Just be aware that MM folks are knee deep into fixes this cycle, so both
> > sets could be moving slowly :)
> 
> Appreciate the heads up. In that case, should I hold off on the header
> split until the next cycle instead of starting it now?

I believe one header split patch is small enough and not controversial to
have it this cycle.
 
> Thanks,
> --breno

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.