All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
Cc: anna-maria@linutronix.de, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: Refresh softirq deadline after clock changes in low-res mode
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:51:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <autinnoNb1wz3MPk@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101172344.426489-1-thnkslprpt@gmail.com>

Le Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 07:23:44PM +0200, Avi Weiss a écrit :
> In periodic low-resolution mode, hrtimer_run_queues() updates the clock
> base offsets at each tick but does not refresh softirq_expires_next.
> When CLOCK_REALTIME is moved forward, an expired soft hrtimer can
> therefore remain pending until the old monotonic deadline is reached.
> 
> Reevaluate the next expiry when hrtimer_update_base() observes a new
> clock-was-set sequence, before checking whether to raise HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ.
> 
> Fixes: 5da70160462e ("hrtimer: Implement support for softirq based hrtimers")
> Signed-off-by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index 17dd38a6cee7..5d1df371e931 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -2289,6 +2289,7 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
>  	struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	ktime_t now;
> +	unsigned int seq;
>  
>  	if (hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
>  		return;
> @@ -2306,7 +2307,10 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
> +	seq = cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq;
>  	now = hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
> +	if (seq != cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq)
> +		hrtimer_update_next_event(cpu_base);

It took some time for me to understand the issue because retrigger_next_event()
takes care of that already.

But if the clock is set and hrtimer_run_queues() happens to run before the base
is locked and update_needs_ipi() is called, the IPI won't happen.

It could be worth adding that to the changelog.

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-01 17:23 [PATCH] hrtimer: Refresh softirq deadline after clock changes in low-res mode Avi Weiss
2026-11-04 16:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-11-09 19:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Avi Weiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=autinnoNb1wz3MPk@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thnkslprpt@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.