All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Anthony W. Marino" <anthony@AWMObjects.com>
To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@NorcrossGroup.com>,
	Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>,
	linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: re[2]: [linux-lvm] System Suggestions
Date: Thu Mar  7 04:07:01 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auto-000021554843@front2.mail.megapathdsl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10203070728480.16043-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl>

On Thursday 07 March 2002 01:32 am, Seth Mos wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > > If you are looking into using the 3Ware controllers watch the
> > > following: The 64xx controllers are underpowered and should better not
> > > be used in raid 5 mode.
> > > The 74xx controllers seem to be good and should be fine with raid5 but
> > > note that raid5 will always have slow write speeds.
> >
> > Is there a way to minimize the write penalty using both XFS and LVM with
> > RAID 5?
>
> Don't use raid5. I always use a combination of raid 1 and 10 for a
> database server. If you have a database that frequently updates records
> you don't want the extra write overhead.
>
> Software raid 1 or 10 will do fine in that case.
> If you have 4 disks you make 2 raid 1 arrays and then stripe those in a
> raid 0. You then have optimum speed at the lowest possible overhead.
>
> Generally that is what you want for a database server.
>
> Cheers
> Seth

I caught a few emails on linux-lvm list where an external log is being used 
as well to better write performance.

Thanks Alot,
Anthony

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-07  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-06 15:04 re[2]: [linux-lvm] System Suggestions Greg Freemyer
2002-03-06 15:11 ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-03-06 15:25   ` Anders Widman
2002-03-06 15:51     ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 15:46   ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 15:57     ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-03-06 16:02       ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 21:40   ` Petro
2002-03-06 21:52     ` Benjamin Scott
2002-03-06 22:47     ` Tim
2002-03-07  4:26       ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-07  4:05     ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 22:15   ` Stuart Levy
2002-03-07  4:24     ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-07  9:29     ` Stuart Levy
2002-03-06 15:23 ` re[2]: " Seth Mos
2002-03-06 15:39   ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-07  0:32     ` Seth Mos
2002-03-07  4:07       ` Anthony W. Marino [this message]
2002-03-07  8:57       ` Tim
2002-03-06 15:30 ` Steven Critchfield
2002-03-06 15:59   ` Kirby C. Bohling
2002-03-06 16:37     ` José Luis Domingo López
2002-03-06 16:41     ` José Luis Domingo López
2002-03-06 17:00   ` re[2]: " Tim
2002-03-06 15:43 ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 16:52 ` Tim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auto-000021554843@front2.mail.megapathdsl.net \
    --to=anthony@awmobjects.com \
    --cc=freemyer@NorcrossGroup.com \
    --cc=knuffie@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=mysql@lists.mysql.com \
    --cc=petro@auctionwatch.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.