From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Anthony W. Marino" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] System Suggestions References: <20020306210600.JKKL21197.imf11bis.bellsouth.net@taz> <20020307034009.GJ32504@auctionwatch.com> <20020306234746.B26236@connectlive.com> In-Reply-To: <20020306234746.B26236@connectlive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Mar 7 04:26:02 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com, Tim On Wednesday 06 March 2002 11:47 pm, Tim wrote: > > We're also having some problems with Mysql that people keep pointing > > fingers at LVM for, but at this time we're point right back and > > saying "No!" in a firm voice... > > MySQL is weak under real read/write concurrent loads. PostgreSQL is > terrific for that. On the other hand, MySQL buries psql for keeping up > with my IDS alerts. Gotta use the right tool for the job... Tim, what about read/write concurrent loads with InnoDb tables? Anthony