Re: [PATCH v8 1/7] mm/memcontrol: flatten try_charge_memcg control flow

[Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 03:30:22PM -0800, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> Refactor try_charge_memcg by flattening the nested memsw/memory
> page_counter operations to separate the logic between the two.
> 
> When page_counter_try_charge is made stock-aware, this flattening makes
> the control flow easier to follow since each page counter now has its
> own success/failure paths.
> 
> No functional changes intended.
> 
> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ffbcea28a608c..66f38efb800ab 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2811,18 +2811,21 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		batch = nr_pages;
>  
>  	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> -	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
> -	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
> -		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
> -			goto done_restock;
> -		if (do_memsw_account())
> -			page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, batch);
> -		mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_counter(counter, memory);
> -	} else {
> +	if (do_memsw_account() &&
> +	    !page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
>  		mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_counter(counter, memsw);
>  		reclaim_options &= ~MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> +		goto reclaim;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
> +		goto done_restock;
> +
> +	if (do_memsw_account())
> +		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, batch);
> +	mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_counter(counter, memory);
> +
> +reclaim:
>  	if (batch > nr_pages) {
>  		batch = nr_pages;
>  		goto retry;
> 

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>