From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793906199; b=tO4qq+7UJtosXRB462ooErzPf83O+si1rGzz2Yl0zY/KtjyZGWl2priLGXxR4daJwlkY Suxm8ab8Jx530OvxjkKXDthCQMFCO2gP2NQ1V9q/IcWyC2XZSxjmnAizW7+CKmIuXz7qX O1vS3GvBCzoJ9g22kiRe2K1uu45bghUCez4sKKyoYGUGGdkeUxje4lG4vEV3bOP+XWEh/ m/R8+Be4PqUrNuUmts3nDqUporc452YucvAnV7ZKoN533hWBogWX/rNP7kH1G9FNfsR3a QQDoNFaTf5YQoHZvAjMvF7JOuqYkzEeD7yNIMaZdgi+xNRl7vVtSi/0BsbzQh6EYkTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793906199; h=Received:Delivered-To:Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=u3fyThc+3I+lnyZedXiXSEynrpY1c1eUJC2nibBtq2k=; b=tTcv8E/yzuxHSo86qkUJRyRnYmeKbs8JC+kJhmowcxHxvVH2+qsYUW/Bk7gljRZnDdQ+ cPSuqyzvHF9ST/glpJ+zRmnV5AcMD0lSLTVA16QTKJGyIRKqdqW1ju4hr0FNQQ97rfN/u RiCxtRkxudah4L5hgSd8Y5Bt5UwPfVBkG4BcrAv/MQ7pulzrP6zqfb6+p75IQAGmG40u0 9UUrhl+47Gup6p5rUGOn9iparQ1w2BZGjNLPQg6GbXWWLv0n8Z3OFoLkXF20LZQtUPrBI ARZLwdEbyNHQO0joTIR5Y3O++lN2JzXSoNjTjHhwLp0lOYcFe4nweyAr9QwlNSzmUSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Oq7OsUEN; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 73636606A31B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Oq7OsUEN Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 29D991F0093A; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 9400E1F000C1; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:16:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793906199; bh=u3fyThc+3I+lnyZedXiXSEynrpY1c1eUJC2nibBtq2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Oq7OsUENIfkaCx7lEQVgj12gQG6H/+F7nGuXU8ZwBikEmIxf48bM0fkkbhmz03H8j 2FMlcVD5KkLt3kPRrliJm66zLIdjlp8CX1XsrYA8NhDxVM3RkPPbBXl32whCzNuVTX rVeEg6PPkyTcaQKka3UmSVXZU9gysUTDTZcAEtH2YAvMX+bqFXK1DDCAgNv83ETwDd vVwIa/5HizICKtuD4HlaDOcEWYxWDyeZelccOLiVWRQ+Fx7psOydcVFdRHDz/wdyZ1 /+1+sa7rIkum1U4DzkJcSjELFT05oz9Ezj0KHd1t9CPj/vXCU/Sb3Q2T1g7RHU8w7N o4ZBfCVohAo3A== Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 20:16:05 +0100 From: Nicolas Schier To: Mark Brown Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , tools@kernel.org Subject: Re: Replying to skipped patches in b4 review Message-ID: References: X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 05:24:13PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi, > > If a patch is marked as skipped in b4 review then email mode will skip > sending any replies for it, it will only send mails for done patches. > If the reason you are sending a reply to a particular patch is that you > have skipped applying it this doesn't work so well - you need to mark > the patch as done, send the mails, then go back and skip the patch. > > Worse, after sending it is not possible to go back into review mode > AFAICT which complicates the skipping. ah thanks! I was afraid that it was a misuse on my side... -- Nicolas