From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: only let the owner release a managed node
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 14:37:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avHMhh8ChrFE_b_e@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102-swnode-only-owner-release-v1-1-ee4c9022a629@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 04:25:16PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> device_create_managed_software_node() creates a node whose lifetime is
> tied to the device it was created for. software_node_notify_remove() is
> called for every device that has the node as its fwnode (primary OR
> secondary) and, if the node is managed, unconditionally detaches it from
> that device and drops the creation reference.
>
> This breaks when the node is shared with another device. Example: the
> i2c-designware copies the parent's fwnode to the adapter's struct device.
> When the adapter is deleted, it releases the reference that belongs to
> the owner and the latter ends up with a dangling pointer.
>
> Record the device's "manager" and only perform the actual release when
> notify is called for that "owner" device.
>
> Reported-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261009164241.923756-2-balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com/
> Fixes: 151f6ff78cdf ("software node: Provide replacement for device_add_properties()")
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Hi!
>
> This is my approach at addressing the bug reported by Vivekanandan
> directly in driver core. Please test it if you can.
This looks good to me, but I think the patch should be simplified somewhat.
> @@ -1190,6 +1191,7 @@ void software_node_notify(struct device *dev)
> void software_node_notify_remove(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct swnode *swnode;
> + bool is_owner;
>
> swnode = dev_to_swnode(dev);
> if (!swnode)
> @@ -1206,9 +1208,13 @@ void software_node_notify_remove(struct device *dev)
> if (!device_match_fwnode(dev, &swnode->fwnode) && swnode->fwnode.dev == dev)
> swnode->fwnode.dev = NULL;
>
> + is_owner = swnode->owner && swnode->owner == dev;
The NULL check here is redundant.
> + if (is_owner)
> + swnode->owner = NULL;
There is no need to clear the owner field as devices are not allowed to be
re-registered.
> +
> swnode_put(swnode);
>
> - if (swnode->managed) {
> + if (is_owner) {
> set_secondary_fwnode(dev, NULL);
> swnode_put(swnode);
> }
And if we drop the managed reference before the notify one, we can drop
the temporary as well and this chunk just becomes:
@@ -1206,12 +1207,12 @@ void software_node_notify_remove(struct device *dev)
if (!device_match_fwnode(dev, &swnode->fwnode) && swnode->fwnode.dev == dev)
swnode->fwnode.dev = NULL;
- swnode_put(swnode);
-
- if (swnode->managed) {
+ if (swnode->owner == dev) {
set_secondary_fwnode(dev, NULL);
swnode_put(swnode);
}
+
+ swnode_put(swnode);
}
The end-result applied for 7.4 (to fix the 7.3 regression) is here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core.git/commit/?h=driver-core-linus&id=95418e71bdcbf8f2073a730365c11d22ff8473f3
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 15:25 [PATCH] software node: only let the owner release a managed node Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 6:47 ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2026-11-04 8:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-04 8:26 ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2026-11-04 8:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-04 8:40 ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2026-11-06 17:47 ` Heikki Krogerus
2026-11-09 13:37 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2026-11-09 14:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-09 14:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-09 14:34 ` Johan Hovold
2026-11-09 14:45 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-09 14:59 ` Johan Hovold
2026-11-09 15:17 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-09 15:55 ` Johan Hovold
2026-11-09 16:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-09 16:20 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avHMhh8ChrFE_b_e@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.