From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, gustavold@gmail.com
Cc: gustavold@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
john.ogness@linutronix.de, pmladek@suse.com,
samuelcrossley@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netconsole: register one console per target
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 03:25:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avL-47QDYmOHN9Pv@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179427493788.994134.10458088525635523245@kernel.org>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 01:42:17AM +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this patch now registers
> a console right after this lockless store of STATE_ENABLED. Can the store
> overwrite a deactivation done at the same time by a NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>
> By the time we get here, netcons_netpoll_setup() has published np.dev,
> dropped the RTNL and waited for a grace period:
>
> drivers/net/netconsole.c:netcons_netpoll_setup() {
> ...
> err = __netpoll_setup(np, ndev);
> if (err)
> goto put;
> rtnl_unlock();
> ...
> synchronize_rcu();
> ...
> }
>
> The target is on target_list during that window, so this sequence looks
> possible:
>
> enabled_store() NETDEV_UNREGISTER
> netcons_netpoll_setup()
> rtnl_unlock()
> synchronize_rcu() netconsole_netdev_event()
> nt->state = STATE_DEACTIVATED;
> list_move(..., &target_cleanup_list);
> netconsole_process_cleanups_core()
> netcons_release_dev()
> do_netpoll_cleanup()
> np->dev = NULL
> target back on target_list
> nt->state = STATE_ENABLED;
> netconsole_register_console()
>
> The next netconsole_write() would pass the state check and call
> netif_running() with a NULL dev:
>
> if (nt->state != STATE_ENABLED || !netif_running(nt->np.dev))
> return;
>
> process_resume_target() handles this race with the reg_state re-check
> under the RTNL, but enabled_store() has no such check. Does it need one?
I understand that this one got fixed by Gustavo's commit f94b9640bcf22b
("netconsole: finish enabling the target before releasing RTNL")
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 13:16 [PATCH net-next] netconsole: register one console per target Breno Leitao
2026-11-10 1:42 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:25 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avL-47QDYmOHN9Pv@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=gustavold@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=samuelcrossley@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.