All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	 robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] string: Implement strstarts() with strprefix()
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:36:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avcR0tSX-Fcq9pPf@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-212840@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4131 bytes --]

> Date: 2026-11-13 13:20:16+0000
> From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
>
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue to consider:
> - [Low] string: strstarts() via strprefix() prevents optimizing out
>   pointer offset
> --
> 
> commit 8cdc2e9c96584305ea94313f2618d17d8e28f303
> Author: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
> 
> string: Implement strstarts() with strprefix()
> 
> This commit changes strstarts() to call strprefix() instead of calling
> strncmp() and strlen() directly.
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/string.h b/include/linux/string.h
> > index 8c6a79d320474..8ca0deda61606 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/string.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/string.h
> > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static inline const char *strprefix(const char *s, const char *prefix)
> >   */
> >  static inline bool strstarts(const char *str, const char *prefix)
> >  {
> > -	return strncmp(str, prefix, strlen(prefix)) == 0;
> > +	return strprefix(str, prefix);
> >  }
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> Can the compiler actually optimize away the s + len pointer arithmetic in
> strprefix() here?
> 
> strprefix() returns strncmp(s, prefix, len) == 0 ? s + len : NULL, and
> converting that result to bool requires proving that s + len is non-NULL
> whenever strncmp() returns 0.  Because the kernel builds with
> -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks and -fno-strict-overflow, the compiler
> cannot assume that a runtime pointer is non-NULL or that s + len does not
> wrap to NULL, so callers of strstarts() end up keeping str and len live
> across strncmp() and emitting the extra addition and NULL check.

Hmmm, it seems it's right; the compiler can't optimize out.  I hadn't
taken those flags into account.

Here's a test which seems to corroborate:

	alx@devuan:~/tmp$ cat strstarts.c 
	#include <string.h>
	bool strstarts(const char *s, const char *prefix)
	{
		return strncmp(s, prefix, strlen(prefix)) == 0;
	}
	alx@devuan:~/tmp$ cat strprefix.c 
	#include <string.h>
	bool strstarts(const char *s, const char *prefix)
	{
		size_t len = strlen(prefix);
		return strncmp(s, prefix, len) == 0 ? s + len : NULL;
	}
	alx@devuan:~/tmp$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-strict-overflow -S strstarts.c 
	alx@devuan:~/tmp$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-strict-overflow -S strprefix.c 
	strprefix.c: In function ‘strstarts’:
	strprefix.c:5:9: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the pointer operand in ‘s + (sizetype)len’ must not be NULL [-Waddress]
	    5 |         return strncmp(s, prefix, len) == 0 ? s + len : NULL;
	      |         ^~~~~~
	alx@devuan:~/tmp$ diff -u strstarts.s strprefix.s
	--- strstarts.s	2026-11-13 14:33:48.478848453 +0100
	+++ strprefix.s	2026-11-13 14:33:51.802880696 +0100
	@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
	-	.file	"strstarts.c"
	+	.file	"strprefix.c"
		.text
		.p2align 4
		.globl	strstarts
	@@ -6,24 +6,45 @@
	 strstarts:
	 .LFB0:
		.cfi_startproc
	-	pushq	%rbx
	+	pushq	%rbp
		.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	-	.cfi_offset 3, -16
	+	.cfi_offset 6, -16
	+	pushq	%rbx
	+	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 24
	+	.cfi_offset 3, -24
		movq	%rdi, %rbx
		movq	%rsi, %rdi
	-	subq	$16, %rsp
	-	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
	+	subq	$24, %rsp
	+	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 48
		movq	%rsi, 8(%rsp)
		call	strlen@PLT
		movq	8(%rsp), %rsi
		movq	%rbx, %rdi
		movq	%rax, %rdx
	+	movq	%rax, %rbp
		call	strncmp@PLT
		testl	%eax, %eax
	-	sete	%al
	-	addq	$16, %rsp
	+	jne	.L4
	+	addq	%rbp, %rbx
	+	setne	%al
	+	addq	$24, %rsp
	+	.cfi_remember_state
	+	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 24
	+	popq	%rbx
		.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	+	popq	%rbp
	+	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
	+	ret
	+	.p2align 4,,10
	+	.p2align 3
	+.L4:
	+	.cfi_restore_state
	+	addq	$24, %rsp
	+	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 24
	+	xorl	%eax, %eax
		popq	%rbx
	+	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	+	popq	%rbp
		.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
		ret
		.cfi_endproc

I'll drop patch 7/7 in v6.

> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1794574496.git.alx@kernel.org?part=7

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-13 13:10 [PATCH v5 0/7] Add strprefix() and fix a bug with it Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] string: Add strprefix(), and deprecate str_has_prefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 14:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-13 14:34     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-13 14:40       ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 14:47         ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-13 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] string: Warn if the prefix is the empty string Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 13:48     ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 14:25       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-13 14:32         ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] device property: Fix fwnode_name_eq() for empty node names Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] stddef: Add const_cast() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] string: Add [C]QChar_of() and QVoid_of() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] string: Make strprefix() const-qualifier-generic Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] string: Implement strstarts() with strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 13:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 13:36     ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2026-11-13 14:44   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-13 14:59     ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 15:07       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-13 15:39         ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-13 16:05           ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avcR0tSX-Fcq9pPf@devuan \
    --to=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.