From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: Further simplify locking with guard()
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:45:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b050730e-ac7d-401b-8210-82453d05b0e5@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927-reset-guard-v1-1-293bf1302210@pengutronix.de>
> Use guard(mutex) to automatically unlock mutexes when going out of
> scope. Simplify error paths by removing a goto and manual mutex
> unlocking in multiple places.
…
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
…
@@ -1041,29 +1036,27 @@ __of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node, const char *id, int index,
}
}
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
rcdev = __reset_find_rcdev(&args, gpio_fallback);
…
rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(rcdev, rstc_id, shared, acquired);
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
out_put:
of_node_put(args.np);
…
Would you like to preserve the same lock scope (which ended before this function call)?
@@ -1098,7 +1091,7 @@ __reset_control_get_from_lookup(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
const char *dev_id = dev_name(dev);
struct reset_control *rstc = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&reset_lookup_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_lookup_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(lookup, &reset_lookup_list, list) {
…
break;
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&reset_lookup_mutex);
-
if (!rstc)
return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
…
Would you really like to increase the lock scope here?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-29 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 14:02 [PATCH] reset: Further simplify locking with guard() Philipp Zabel
2024-09-28 22:27 ` [heads-up] " Al Viro
2024-09-29 18:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-30 15:22 ` Philipp Zabel
2024-09-29 7:39 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-29 10:45 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2024-09-30 15:26 ` Philipp Zabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b050730e-ac7d-401b-8210-82453d05b0e5@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.