All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	<vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>, <soham.purkait@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add idle engine activity test
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:28:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0d46f96-204d-4efb-88dd-883eb808e191@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6+UnNfsGcQ3QkFf@orsosgc001>

Hi Umesh

On 2/15/2025 12:38 AM, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:28:29PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>> Add a test to validate engine is idle by reading PMU counters
>> (engine-active-ticks, engine-total-ticks) when idle
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/xe_pmu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>> index cbb825755..b47be23ac 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>> #define SLEEP_DURATION 2 /* in seconds */
>> const double tolerance = 0.1;
>>
>> +/* flag masks */
>> +#define TEST_BUSY    BIT(0)
> 
> s/BUSY/ACTIVE/
Will fix this. copied the i915 names
Will change it throughout the tests
> 
>> +
>> #define assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance) \
>>     igt_assert_f((double)(x) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(ref) && \
>>              (double)(x) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(ref), \
>> @@ -79,11 +82,13 @@ static uint64_t get_event_config(int xe, unsigned 
>> int gt, struct drm_xe_engine_c
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> + * SUBTEST: engine-activity-idle
>> + * Description: Test to validate engine activity shows no load when idle
>> + *
>>  * SUBTEST: engine-activity
>> - * Description: Test to validate engine activity stats by running a 
>> workload and
>> - *              reading the active ticks and total ticks PMU counters
>> + * Description: Test to validate engine activity stats by running 
>> full load
>>  */
>> -static void engine_activity(int fd, struct 
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
>> +static void engine_activity(int fd, struct 
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>>     uint64_t config, busy_ticks, total_ticks, before[2], after[2];
>>     struct xe_cork *cork = NULL;
>> @@ -97,14 +102,18 @@ static void engine_activity(int fd, struct 
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
>>     pmu_fd[1] = open_group(fd, config, pmu_fd[0]);
>>
>>     vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
>> -    cork = xe_cork_create_opts(fd, eci, vm, 1, 1);
>> -    xe_cork_sync_start(fd, cork);
>> +
>> +    if (flags & TEST_BUSY) {
>> +        cork = xe_cork_create_opts(fd, eci, vm, 1, 1);
>> +        xe_cork_sync_start(fd, cork);
>> +    }
>>
>>     pmu_read_multi(pmu_fd[0], 2, before);
>>     usleep(SLEEP_DURATION * USEC_PER_SEC);
> 
> Usually, I see 3 cases for a single type of test
> 
> 1) idle (no spinner is run)
> 2) active (spinner is run, both samples are captured while running).
> 3) active, then idle (spinner is run, capture second sample after ending 
> spinner)
> 
> Can you also please add case (3). Rest looks good.
Sure will add the trailing idle case

Thanks
Riana
> 
> Thanks,
> Umesh
>>     pmu_read_multi(pmu_fd[0], 2, after);
>>
>> -    xe_cork_sync_end(fd, cork);
>> +    if (flags & TEST_BUSY)
>> +        xe_cork_sync_end(fd, cork);
>>
>>     busy_ticks = after[0] - before[0];
>>     total_ticks = after[1] - before[1];
>> @@ -122,7 +131,10 @@ static void engine_activity(int fd, struct 
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
>>     close(pmu_fd[0]);
>>     close(pmu_fd[1]);
>>
>> -    assert_within_epsilon(busy_ticks, total_ticks, tolerance);
>> +    if (flags & TEST_BUSY)
>> +        assert_within_epsilon(busy_ticks, total_ticks, tolerance);
>> +    else
>> +        igt_assert(!busy_ticks);
>> }
>>
>> igt_main
>> @@ -134,12 +146,19 @@ igt_main
>>         fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
>>     }
>>
>> +    igt_describe("Validate there is no engine activity when idle");
>> +    igt_subtest_with_dynamic("engine-activity-idle")
>> +        xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe)
>> +            igt_dynamic_f("engine-%s%d", xe_engine_class_string(hwe- 
>> >engine_class),
>> +                      hwe->engine_instance)
>> +                engine_activity(fd, hwe, 0);
>> +
>>     igt_describe("Validate engine activity with workload running by 
>> reading pmu counters");
>>     igt_subtest_with_dynamic("engine-activity")
>>         xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe)
>>             igt_dynamic_f("engine-%s%d", xe_engine_class_string(hwe- 
>> >engine_class),
>>                       hwe->engine_instance)
>> -                engine_activity(fd, hwe);
>> +                engine_activity(fd, hwe, TEST_BUSY);
>>
>>     igt_fixture {
>>         close(fd);
>> -- 
>> 2.47.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-17  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-12  9:58 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Add PMU tests to validate engine activity Riana Tauro
2025-02-12  9:58 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib/igt_perf: Add utils to extract PMU event info Riana Tauro
2025-02-13 14:30   ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-02-16 11:26   ` Purkait, Soham
2025-02-12  9:58 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add PMU test to validate engine activity stats Riana Tauro
2025-02-14 18:55   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-14 19:01     ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-12  9:58 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add idle engine activity test Riana Tauro
2025-02-14 19:08   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-17  6:58     ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2025-02-13  1:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add PMU tests to validate engine activity Patchwork
2025-02-13  1:20 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 10:04 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-13 12:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0d46f96-204d-4efb-88dd-883eb808e191@intel.com \
    --to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.