All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] io_uring: add support for IORING_SETUP_SQE_MIXED
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:44:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b11faaad-3142-4db9-b3e8-55b8785264b9@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADUfDZpL2r2nhVDGZF07pDwNw-agxogo3hz2VDvJNvZK+h_Uug@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/25/25 12:21 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
>>> +int io_uring_cmd128_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>> +{
>>> +     if (!(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQE_MIXED))
>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>> +     return io_uring_cmd_prep(req, sqe);
>>> +}
>>
>> Why isn't this just allowed for SQE128 as well? There should be no
>> reason to disallow explicitly 128b sqe commands in SQE128 mode, they
>> should work for any mode that supports 128b SQEs which is either
>> SQE_MIXED or SQE128?
> 
> Not to mention, the check in io_init_req() should already have
> rejected a 128-byte operation on a non-IORING_SETUP_SQE_MIXED
> io_ring_ctx.

Yes good point, it should all be caught there, no need for any per-op
checking (or the separate prep handler).

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 15:12 [PATCHv3 0/3] Keith Busch
2025-09-24 15:12 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] Add support IORING_SETUP_SQE_MIXED Keith Busch
2025-09-24 20:20   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-24 20:30     ` Keith Busch
2025-09-24 20:37       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-24 15:12 ` [PATCHv3 1/1] io_uring: add support for IORING_SETUP_SQE_MIXED Keith Busch
2025-09-25 15:03   ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-25 18:21     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-25 18:44       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-09-24 15:12 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] Add nop testing " Keith Busch
2025-09-24 15:12 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] Add mixed sqe test for uring commands Keith Busch
2025-09-24 15:54 ` [PATCHv3 0/3] io_uring: mixed submission queue size support Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b11faaad-3142-4db9-b3e8-55b8785264b9@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.