All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, lschlesinger@drivenets.com,
	dsahern@kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org, crosser@average.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] vrf: run conntrack only in context of lower/physdev for locally generated packets
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:25:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b148c973-c4e9-e4ea-6045-2111f00eaa79@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025141400.13698-3-fw@strlen.de>

On 10/25/21 8:14 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> The VRF driver invokes netfilter for output+postrouting hooks so that users
> can create rules that check for 'oif $vrf' rather than lower device name.
> 
> This is a problem when NAT rules are configured.
> 
> To avoid any conntrack involvement in round 1, tag skbs as 'untracked'
> to prevent conntrack from picking them up.
> 
> This gets cleared before the packet gets handed to the ip stack so
> conntrack will be active on the second iteration.
> 
> One remaining issue is that a rule like
> 
>   output ... oif $vrfname notrack
> 
> won't propagate to the second round because we can't tell
> 'notrack set via ruleset' and 'notrack set by vrf driver' apart.
> However, this isn't a regression: the 'notrack' removal happens
> instead of unconditional nf_reset_ct().
> I'd also like to avoid leaking more vrf specific conditionals into the
> netfilter infra.
> 
> For ingress, conntrack has already been done before the packet makes it
> to the vrf driver, with this patch egress does connection tracking with
> lower/physical device as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/vrf.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>



  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-25 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25 14:13 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] vrf: rework interaction with netfilter/conntrack Florian Westphal
2021-10-25 14:13 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: skip confirmation and nat hooks in postrouting for vrf Florian Westphal
2021-10-25 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] vrf: run conntrack only in context of lower/physdev for locally generated packets Florian Westphal
2021-10-25 14:25   ` David Ahern [this message]
2021-10-26 12:36   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-10-26 12:58     ` Florian Westphal
2021-10-26 13:16       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-10-26 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] vrf: rework interaction with netfilter/conntrack patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b148c973-c4e9-e4ea-6045-2111f00eaa79@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=crosser@average.org \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=lschlesinger@drivenets.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.