From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: michael chang <thenewme91@gmail.com>
Subject: WinFS beta out
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:04:59 -0400
Message-ID: <b14e81f00509010704adfb22a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e692861c0508292136543a02e1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <43147EFE.2020804@perkel.com> <df2lhc$brk$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <200508310100.06889.chrivers@iversen-net.dk>
	 <028201c5ae18$edcfe4c0$d60310ac@homedom>
	 <b14e81f005083106453fd2605b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <033501c5aece$8b2f8350$d60310ac@homedom>
	 <b14e81f0050901070453f4d898@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25789-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <b14e81f0050901070453f4d898@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Reiserfs List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On 9/1/05, LiFe <LiFers@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> pretty fast. Unfortunately, as indicated before, they seem to have based =
the
> bit storage mechanism on NTFS, so slow writes, massive fragmentation,
> breakable jounaling.

Bah, in that case, I'll probably just end up sticking with
FAT/reiserfs dual-boots (switching to Reiser4 when resizers and/or
repackers and/or converters are available).  A lot of low-end machines
don't have enough hard-disk performance to handle fragmentation well.
I think fragmentation is one of the key things that makes computers
such a pain in the ass to use.

--
~Mike
 - Just my two cents
 - No man is an island, and no man is unable.