From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: michael chang <thenewme91@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:24:57 -0400
Message-ID: <b14e81f00509051424282984c7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4317FD1B.504@namesys.com>
	 <Pine.GSO.4.44L.0509021620380.23379-100000@unix2.cc.ksu.edu>
	 <b14e81f005090318046ee67d7e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <431A5E43.4060005@slaphack.com> <431A6E71.4060105@namesys.com>
	 <194f6255050904022932ca34ea@mail.gmail.com>
	 <431B23ED.7070505@slaphack.com>
	 <b14e81f005090505162a15723a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <431C8C7B.4050409@slaphack.com>
Reply-To: thenewme91@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25868-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <431C8C7B.4050409@slaphack.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
Cc: linuxhippy@gmail.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On 9/5/05, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:
> I'm betting that a user who wants to tune this and understands what it
> means won't want to have to recompile just to test out a new setting,

Maybe because s/he is in a special situation? I suppose...

--=20
~Mike
 - Just my two cents
 - No man is an island, and no man is unable.