From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3739BC4743C for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9EC61289 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230028AbhFVAuf (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:50:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229762AbhFVAue (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:50:34 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04F1C061574 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id q18so16948140ile.10 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:48:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kbcQjN8MVAZM0FwGPkinh9qCyh3jo4RCpZr8Jex4Yd8=; b=b9hwXg1j8oWHhJsnCyvgdpHPGsaq+K0eMuXe2CZcbDVW3Vi7Cx5bUumoHa6o648QY6 K4EdB917pTsw1WIBH9iLizCqp68spdj1T472NMnDbdM6vg4EuMEDs5gf8cqkfcUE9V8v /CKWo//vlBD9X4IZ8iAVWSnaeHcKIkTw+ttkM7kaYz3tEzfIcBGr+V/cSuSrugvJbuQf yGnXs+zTktxbdvFu4oQiYbsd9wqCF6zRZY6Jmaq91AxiRZM07nMVYbZn+v5wRBo8E4r5 6bhOw6Sr9xk+kBJWVTJtObXoLjIOYwc7WugwDyDdWUC56WAiTYYWVsSxMaHj1lgE6KmP +PZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kbcQjN8MVAZM0FwGPkinh9qCyh3jo4RCpZr8Jex4Yd8=; b=jwLzxAtAxNDY9Wai13vwpsgV+IIhO83v8dcwqKnnrVEY9ecMRRSGV8sM5ep6sFecBj B/5zSkJfty0LKlzngrdn51sC0+FVbSOlld3VX/nTkB55tqpsrNqm0QI2hLw4owRdVbkr O8n6KH6ay/Dbfn+kvvUp5j5gtVAPc4N1DETCdgWQgUBPmpCRR5Tdsa7cRVQ/G9isGlIX 7zr16xOBrMdR4u04NnSxLwBzvKd1TA/yu61JYm7yjM/QT7bHFh01g37zm3M4+S9BwGWs WdGi7tQraVfMhPox3vsldgAgO0mI3zc1ND48JJFVp4BLFHOpGdFsEfhv6tBqVHIp9QOg FOfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fOkflkE6g+nPP4JV7QMXsZwojTSwaP9xY9puyw7Pg87QNQjpf rNyVbQYGPs0nAy5ekosQkb+8fSEBwZr70g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjzSJ21WigdMeiKr1eAL/JhW8AWeEoPoLjdtP1IYA+xppOLTXhw7s55E2i7em9JucKq4kaEw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:6705:: with SMTP id b5mr683868ilc.55.1624322898040; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([198.8.77.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm10572906iol.16.2021.06.21.17.48.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_=e2=9d=8c_FAIL=3a_Test_report_for_kernel_5=2e13=2e0?= =?UTF-8?Q?-rc6_=28block=2c_b0740de3=29?= To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Veronika Kabatova , CKI Project , linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <42b91718-9d70-4e4c-2716-6259321abd64@kernel.dk> <8a7b26a3-a17d-e851-690a-5a33b06f5dec@gmail.com> <5cf4b5ae-c6aa-d64d-53ec-3e073a77baef@kernel.dk> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:48:15 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 6/21/21 5:49 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:42:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 6/21/21 5:32 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:57:06PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >>>> On 6/21/21 10:58 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:07:16PM +0200, Veronika Kabatova wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:00 PM Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/21/21 2:57 PM, Veronika Kabatova wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:20 PM Veronika Kabatova wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:17 PM CKI Project wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git >>>>>>>>>> Commit: b0740de3330a - Merge branch 'for-5.14/drivers-late' into for-next >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The results of these automated tests are provided below. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Overall result: FAILED (see details below) >>>>>>>>>> Merge: OK >>>>>>>>>> Compile: FAILED >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the failure is introduced between this commit and d142f908ebab64955eb48e. >>>>>>>>> Currently seeing if I can bisect it closer but maybe someone already has an >>>>>>>>> idea what went wrong. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> First commit failing the compilation is 7a2b0ef2a3b83733d7. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where's the log? Adding Willy... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Logs and kernel configs for each arch are linked in the original email at >>>>>> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/06/21/324657779 >>>>> >>>>> Which aren't there by the time they get to the original commit author. >>>>> You need to do better than this; the Intel build-bot bisects to the >>>>> commit which actually causes the error. >>>> >>>> Matthew, I've just followed the link out of curiosity: >>> >>> the link _which isn't in the first email i got_. the redhat cki system >>> is not very useful _because it doesn't do an automatic bisect and cc the >>> author of the commit_. >> >> Kinks are still being worked out on that, nobody has claimed it's >> perfect yet. Some manual input/labor is still required. >> >> But it's useful, as this report has indicated. So maybe try and be a bit >> nicer and appreciative, instead of grumpy and dismissive. It did find a >> problem with YOUR patch, fwiw. > > and i've already fixed it, and tested it with a make allmodconfig. Which should have been done before submitting a patch like this. > turned out to be the only missing place. > > i get grumpy when people implement auto-harassing systems badly. It's a bad look of entitlement when complaints are made about everything not being served on a silver platter. The service has been useful to me, and it was useful in this particular case. Can it be improved? Surely, everything can, and this one is a bit more rough around the edges than the intel build bot. Which, coincidentally, has been around for many years, so hardly surprising. This one triggered quickly, the intel bot sometimes takes _days_ to produce anything. Improvements can be made in both cases. And _I_ was the one that CC'ed you on the report, as it was your commit that broke the build, not the bot. Nobody got auto-harassed here. -- Jens Axboe