All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
	nrb@linux.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/7] lib: s390x: Add ap library
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:15:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1bb6df4-dea3-414d-9f53-dfd76571fbb7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202145913.34831-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

I made a few comments and suggestions. I am not very well-versed in the 
inline assembly code, so I'll leave that up to someone who is more 
knowledgeable. I copied @Harald since I believe it was him who wrote it.

On 2/2/24 9:59 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Add functions and definitions needed to test the Adjunct
> Processor (AP) crypto interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   lib/s390x/ap.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   lib/s390x/ap.h | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   s390x/Makefile |  1 +
>   3 files changed, 186 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 lib/s390x/ap.c
>   create mode 100644 lib/s390x/ap.h
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/ap.c b/lib/s390x/ap.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..9560ff64
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/s390x/ap.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * AP crypto functions
> + *
> + * Some parts taken from the Linux AP driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024
> + * Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + *	   Tony Krowiak <akrowia@linux.ibm.com>
> + *	   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> + *	   Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <interrupt.h>
> +#include <ap.h>
> +#include <asm/time.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +
> +int ap_pqap_tapq(uint8_t ap, uint8_t qn, struct ap_queue_status *apqsw,
> +		 struct pqap_r2 *r2)
> +{
> +	struct pqap_r0 r0 = {
> +		.ap = ap,
> +		.qn = qn,
> +		.fc = PQAP_TEST_APQ
> +	};
> +	uint64_t bogus_cc = 2;
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Test AP Queue
> +	 *
> +	 * Writes AP configuration information to the memory pointed
> +	 * at by GR2.
> +	 *
> +	 * Inputs: GR0
> +	 * Outputs: GR1 (APQSW), GR2 (tapq data)
> +	 * Synchronous
> +	 */
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"       tmll	%[bogus_cc],3\n"
> +		"	lgr	0,%[r0]\n"
> +		"	.insn	rre,0xb2af0000,0,0\n" /* PQAP */
> +		"	stg	1,%[apqsw]\n"
> +		"	stg	2,%[r2]\n"
> +		"	ipm	%[cc]\n"
> +		"	srl	%[cc],28\n"
> +		: [apqsw] "=&T" (*apqsw), [r2] "=&T" (*r2), [cc] "=&d" (cc)
> +		: [r0] "d" (r0), [bogus_cc] "d" (bogus_cc));
> +
> +	return cc;
> +}
> +
> +int ap_pqap_qci(struct ap_config_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct pqap_r0 r0 = { .fc = PQAP_QUERY_AP_CONF_INFO };
> +	uint64_t bogus_cc = 2;
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Query AP Configuration Information
> +	 *
> +	 * Writes AP configuration information to the memory pointed
> +	 * at by GR2.
> +	 *
> +	 * Inputs: GR0, GR2 (QCI block address)
> +	 * Outputs: memory at GR2 address
> +	 * Synchronous
> +	 */
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"       tmll	%[bogus_cc],3\n"
> +		"	lgr	0,%[r0]\n"
> +		"	lgr	2,%[info]\n"
> +		"	.insn	rre,0xb2af0000,0,0\n" /* PQAP */
> +		"	ipm	%[cc]\n"
> +		"	srl	%[cc],28\n"
> +		: [cc] "=&d" (cc)
> +		: [r0] "d" (r0), [info] "d" (info), [bogus_cc] "d" (bogus_cc)
> +		: "cc", "memory", "0", "2");
> +
> +	return cc;
> +}
> +
> +/* Will later be extended to a proper setup function */
> +bool ap_setup(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Base AP support has no STFLE or SCLP feature bit but the
> +	 * PQAP QCI support is indicated via stfle bit 12. As this
> +	 * library relies on QCI we bail out if it's not available.
> +	 */
> +	if (!test_facility(12))
> +		return false;


The STFLE.12 can be turned off when starting the guest, so this may not 
be a valid test.

We use the ap_instructions_available function (in ap.h) which executes 
the TAPQ command to verify whether the AP instructions are installed or 
not. Maybe you can do something similar here:


static inline bool ap_instructions_available(void)

{
     unsigned long reg0 = 0x0000;
     unsigned long reg1 = 0;

     asm volatile(
         "    lgr    0,%[reg0]\n"        /* qid into gr0 */
         "    lghi    1,0\n"            /* 0 into gr1 */
         "    lghi    2,0\n"            /* 0 into gr2 */
         "    .insn    rre,0xb2af0000,0,0\n"    /* PQAP(TAPQ) */
         "0:    la    %[reg1],1\n"        /* 1 into reg1 */
         "1:\n"
         EX_TABLE(0b, 1b)
         : [reg1] "+&d" (reg1)
         : [reg0] "d" (reg0)
         : "cc", "0", "1", "2");
     return reg1 != 0;
}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/ap.h b/lib/s390x/ap.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..b806513f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/s390x/ap.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * AP definitions
> + *
> + * Some parts taken from the Linux AP driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024
> + * Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + *	   Tony Krowiak <akrowia@linux.ibm.com>
> + *	   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> + *	   Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _S390X_AP_H_
> +#define _S390X_AP_H_
> +
> +enum PQAP_FC {
> +	PQAP_TEST_APQ,
> +	PQAP_RESET_APQ,
> +	PQAP_ZEROIZE_APQ,
> +	PQAP_QUEUE_INT_CONTRL,
> +	PQAP_QUERY_AP_CONF_INFO,
> +	PQAP_QUERY_AP_COMP_TYPE,
> +	PQAP_BEST_AP,


Maybe use abbreviations like your function names above?

	PQAP_TAPQ,
	PQAP_RAPQ,
	PQAP_ZAPQ,
	PQAP_AQIC,
	PQAP_QCI,
	PQAP_QACT,
	PQAP_QBAP


> +};
> +
> +struct ap_queue_status {
> +	uint32_t pad0;			/* Ignored padding for zArch  */


Bit 0 is the E (queue empty) bit.


> +	uint32_t empty		: 1;
> +	uint32_t replies_waiting: 1;
> +	uint32_t full		: 1;
> +	uint32_t pad1		: 4;
> +	uint32_t irq_enabled	: 1;
> +	uint32_t rc		: 8;
> +	uint32_t pad2		: 16;
> +} __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +_Static_assert(sizeof(struct ap_queue_status) == sizeof(uint64_t), "APQSW size");
> +
> +struct ap_config_info {
> +	uint8_t apsc	 : 1;	/* S bit */
> +	uint8_t apxa	 : 1;	/* N bit */
> +	uint8_t qact	 : 1;	/* C bit */
> +	uint8_t rc8a	 : 1;	/* R bit */
> +	uint8_t l	 : 1;	/* L bit */
> +	uint8_t lext	 : 3;	/* Lext bits */
> +	uint8_t reserved2[3];
> +	uint8_t Na;		/* max # of APs - 1 */
> +	uint8_t Nd;		/* max # of Domains - 1 */
> +	uint8_t reserved6[10];
> +	uint32_t apm[8];	/* AP ID mask */
> +	uint32_t aqm[8];	/* AP (usage) queue mask */
> +	uint32_t adm[8];	/* AP (control) domain mask */
> +	uint8_t _reserved4[16];
> +} __attribute__((aligned(8))) __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +_Static_assert(sizeof(struct ap_config_info) == 128, "PQAP QCI size");
> +
> +struct pqap_r0 {
> +	uint32_t pad0;
> +	uint8_t fc;
> +	uint8_t t : 1;		/* Test facilities (TAPQ)*/
> +	uint8_t pad1 : 7;
> +	uint8_t ap;


This is the APID part of an APQN, so how about renaming to 'apid'


> +	uint8_t qn;


This is the APQI  part of an APQN, so how about renaming to 'apqi'


> +} __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
> +struct pqap_r2 {
> +	uint8_t s : 1;		/* Special Command facility */
> +	uint8_t m : 1;		/* AP4KM */
> +	uint8_t c : 1;		/* AP4KC */
> +	uint8_t cop : 1;	/* AP is in coprocessor mode */
> +	uint8_t acc : 1;	/* AP is in accelerator mode */
> +	uint8_t xcp : 1;	/* AP is in XCP-mode */
> +	uint8_t n : 1;		/* AP extended addressing facility */
> +	uint8_t pad_0 : 1;
> +	uint8_t pad_1[3];


Is there a reason why the 'Classification'  field is left out?


> +	uint8_t at;
> +	uint8_t nd;
> +	uint8_t pad_6;
> +	uint8_t pad_7 : 4;
> +	uint8_t qd : 4;
> +} __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +_Static_assert(sizeof(struct pqap_r2) == sizeof(uint64_t), "pqap_r2 size");
> +
> +bool ap_setup(void);
> +int ap_pqap_tapq(uint8_t ap, uint8_t qn, struct ap_queue_status *apqsw,
> +		 struct pqap_r2 *r2);
> +int ap_pqap_qci(struct ap_config_info *info);
> +#endif
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 7fce9f9d..4f6c627d 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ cflatobjs += lib/s390x/malloc_io.o
>   cflatobjs += lib/s390x/uv.o
>   cflatobjs += lib/s390x/sie.o
>   cflatobjs += lib/s390x/fault.o
> +cflatobjs += lib/s390x/ap.o
>   
>   OBJDIRS += lib/s390x
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-02 14:59 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/7] s390x: Add base AP support Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/7] lib: s390x: Add ap library Janosch Frank
2024-02-05 18:15   ` Anthony Krowiak [this message]
2024-02-06  8:48     ` Harald Freudenberger
2024-02-06 15:45       ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-06 13:42     ` Janosch Frank
2024-02-06 15:55       ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-07  8:06         ` Harald Freudenberger
2024-02-07 14:30           ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/7] s390x: Add guest 2 AP test Janosch Frank
2024-02-20 16:38   ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-21  7:57     ` Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/7] lib: s390x: ap: Add proper ap setup code Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/7] s390x: ap: Add pqap aqic tests Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/7] s390x: ap: Add reset tests Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 6/7] lib: s390x: ap: Add tapq test facility bit Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 7/7] s390x: ap: Add nq/dq len test Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1bb6df4-dea3-414d-9f53-dfd76571fbb7@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.